YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Nicholas Garcia

Human avatar
Senior Policy Counsel at Public Knowledge, working on technology policy and AI governance.
The sweeping preemption clause in this bill goes far beyond replacing state laws that might conflict or duplicate this federal framework. It locks states out of even simple, light-touch transparency and evaluation regulations for other kinds of harms or risks. We cannot advance AI innovation and adoption without trust, and trust is earned through more transparency, independent evaluation, and clear mechanisms for accountability.
AI Verified (Jun 4, 2026)
Source:
Nicholas Garcia, Public Knowledge statement on the Great American Artificial Intelligence Act, June 4, 2026.
Like Share on X 5h ago
Policy proposals and claims
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Garcia opposes broad AI-law preemption because it locks states out of transparency and evaluation rules, supporting state authority. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Garcia opposes state-law preemption, supporting state authority; recorded for is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified verbatim in Public Knowledge’s June 4, 2026 statement; attributed to Nicholas Garcia. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago
replying to Nicholas Garcia