YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Matthew Gizzo

Human avatar
Shareholder at Ogletree Deakins and co-chair of the firm's Technology Practice Group; testified to Congress on AI's workplace impact in 2026.
Congress has an opportunity to foster this innovation by adopting a regulatory approach that is careful, deliberate, and grounded in the realities of wage and hour compliance. That means resisting the temptation to impose prescriptive mandates that would stifle the development and use of beneficial AI applications. It means establishing a uniform federal standard that preempts the growing patchwork of inconsistent state regulations.
AI Verified (Apr 15, 2026)
Source:
Written Testimony of Matthew Paul Gizzo, House Education and Workforce Subcommittee hearing on “Building an AI-Ready America: Understanding AI’s Economic Impact on Workers and Employers”
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Gizzo argues for a uniform federal standard that preempts inconsistent state regulations, which directly bears on whether states should keep stricter AI safety authority. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Gizzo explicitly argues for a uniform federal standard that preempts inconsistent state regulations, so the statement is opposed. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified House testimony PDF on April 15, 2026 contains the quote verbatim at lines 313-315 and attributes it to Matthew Paul Gizzo. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Matthew Gizzo