YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Andrew Ng

Avatar
Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
I'm disappointed [the Big Beautiful Bill] didn't include a proposed moratorium on U.S. state-level AI regulation. While there is a role for AI regulation, it is when the technology is new and poorly understood that lobbyists are most likely to succeed at pushing through anti-competitive regulations that hamper open-source and other beneficial AI efforts. [...] A moratorium on state-level regulation would have been a net benefit to AI and to society.
AI Verified source (2026)
Like Share on X 2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly implies opposition to the statement: the author says a moratorium on state-level AI regulation "would have been a net benefit," which means states should not retain broad authority to impose their own stricter AI rules beyond federal policy. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote says the author wanted "a proposed moratorium on U.S. state-level AI regulation" and that "a moratorium on state-level regulation would have been a net benefit," which clearly opposes states retaining the ability to impose stricter AI rules. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Andrew Ng’s DeepLearning.AI article published July 9, 2025 contains the quoted opening, the sentence about lobbyists pushing anti-competitive AI rules, and later the closing claim that a moratorium on state-level regulation would benefit AI and society; Andrew Ng’s LinkedIn post repeats the same text. The bracketed clarification and ellipsis are faithful, but the reliable evidence I found dates the quote to 2025 rather than 2026. ([deeplearning.ai](https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/how-the-u-s-one-big-beautiful-bill-will-shape-ai-regulation)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 22d ago
replying to Andrew Ng