YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Tom Mann

Human avatar
State policy manager for the Computer & Communications Industry Association, a technology-industry trade group.
[The bill] would create a standalone state framework that increases compliance burdens without delivering clear safety benefits.
AI Verified (Feb 10, 2026)
Source:
Tom Mann, quoted in Jim Turner, “Gov. DeSantis, Florida House differ on AI legislation,” WUSF / News Service of Florida, February 10, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote opposes a standalone state AI framework as burdensome without safety benefits, directly bearing on stricter state standards. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded answer against is correct. Mann calls the state framework burdensome without clear safety benefits; this supports against. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified verbatim in WUSF, Feb. 10, 2026: Mann says the bill “would create a standalone state framework…”. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Tom Mann