YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Andrew R. Garbarino

Human avatar
U.S. Representative from New York and Chair of the House Homeland Security Committee.
I think federal pre-emption is something that should be part of it.
AI Verified (Jun 28, 2026)
Source:
Andrew R. Garbarino, remarks on AI policy in “We Need to Be Able to Defend At Computer Speed,” House Committee on Homeland Security, June 28, 2026.
Like Share on X 57min ago

Policy proposals and claims

States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Support for federal pre-emption directly indicates opposition to stricter state AI standards. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 45min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer is against: federal pre-emption conflicts with retaining stricter state standards. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 45min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified House Homeland Security’s June 28, 2026 release attributes this exact remark to Chairman Garbarino. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 45min ago
replying to Andrew R. Garbarino