We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen
Cast your vote:
Results (31 votes):
Total
(31 votes)
For 12 (39%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 19 (61%)
·
For (11)
-
Matt BruenigFounder of the People’s Policy Project and writer on economic policy and social insurance.votes For and says:
The objections to Bernie Sanders’s proposal for an AI sovereign wealth fund simply don’t hold up to scrutiny.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dustin GuastellaDirector of operations at the Center for Working-Class Politics and writer on labor and economic policy.votes For and says:
Artificial intelligence has been built by robbing the collective work of humanity. The public built AI — we should own it, not a handful of billionaires.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Winston MaAdjunct professor of law at New York University and author on law, finance, and artificial intelligence.votes For and says:
Notably, the structure envisioned by OpenAI is based on this model — equity donations from AI labs pooled into a single unit paying dividends to the American public.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James BroughelEconomist focused on regulationvotes For and says:
OpenAI wants to give Washington 5% of the company. Critics cry socialism, but an Alaska-style fund built on contributed equity is a deal Congress would be foolish to refuse.
AI Verified source (Jul 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rogé KarmaStaff writer at The Atlantic covering economics, technology, and public policy.votes For and says:
If the wealth generated by artificial intelligence will accrue only to the owners of AI companies, then the way to avoid catastrophic levels of inequality is to give everyone an ownership stake in those companies.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:
[...] and that is why, just last week, I introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act. This legislation would give the public a direct ownership stake in the largest AI companies in America. It would allow the American people, through their g...
more AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Donald J. TrumpU.S. President (2025–present)votes For and says:
I’m going to have meetings with the top 12 or 15 executives very shortly, and we’re talking about giving back something to the public, and if we do that, the public will become very rich.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alex BoresNew York State Assemblymembervotes For and says:
At its core, the AI Dividend is simple: if AI dramatically increases productivity and concentrates wealth, the American people have a stake in those gains.
AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
OpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:
Create a Public Wealth Fund that provides every citizen—including those not invested in financial markets—with a stake in AI-driven economic growth. Policymakers and AI companies should work together to determine how to best seed the Fund, which coul...
more AI Verified source (Apr 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeremy Bearer-FriendProfessor of Law at George Washington University; tax law scholar focused on AI and equityvotes For and says:
We propose a tax that would allow the public to own a share of AI itself, not just through future income tax liabilities or new excise taxes, but a proposed ownership structure that requires a one-time tax payment by generative AI firms in the form o...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Vinod KhoslaVenture capitalist; Khosla Ventures foundervotes For and says:
AI will transform economies and need a rethink of capitalism & equity. Labor portion of economy (vs capital) will decline sharply. [...] Take 10% of every corporation and put it in a national pool for the people. Sharing the wealth of AI is a really,...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (19)
-
Kevin T. FrazierAI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas School of Law.votes Against and says:
While the proposals for AI profit sharing vary in their precise details, a quick review of their likely outcomes should quickly deflate the popular excitement that has formed in response to calls for new taxes, public wealth funds, and the like.
AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Clyde Wayne CrewsVice President for Policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute; policy analyst and author on regulation and technology.votes Against and says:
An AI welfare state would complete the transformation from capitalism to political management via a permanent, non-reformable administrative state.
AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Fred AshtonEconomic policy analyst at the American Action Forum, writing on competition, technology, and regulation.votes Against and says:
Direct government involvement – from inside the boardroom – in the rapidly developing AI market would undermine competition by creating a perverse set of incentives that slow innovation and rob consumers and businesses of new products.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hamilton NolanLabor journalist; author of the "How Things Work" newsletter and the book "The Hammer"; former writer at Gawker and In These Timesvotes Against and says:
This is extremely dangerous. [...] Because, by promoting in the American public the idea that we all have a direct stake in the economic success of these companies, a sovereign wealth fund encourages everyone to think not as citizens, but as investor...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tad DeHavenPolicy analyst at the Cato Institute focusing on taxation, budgets, and government intervention.votes Against and says:
Sanders’s AI sovereign wealth fund should be rejected, but so should the Trump precedents greasing the skids for it.
AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Samuel HammondDirector of AI Policy and Chief Economist at the Foundation for American Innovationvotes Against and says:
Even if taking partial ownership of frontier AI companies can make sense on paper, in practice it's a recipe for political favoritism and corruption.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ilya SominLaw professor and political scholarvotes Against and says:
Stock is private property, and seizing 50% of the stock value of major firms is a pretty obvious case of confiscation. [...] It does not matter that Sanders proposes to take "only" 50% of the stock, rather than 100%. If the government seizes half you...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeong Hee-yongSecretary-General of South Korea's People Power Party (PPP); member of the National Assemblyvotes Against and says:
[The national dividend proposal is] an anti-market idea that goes against market principles and is no different from socialist-style distribution.
AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dean BakerEconomist; co-founder and senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)votes Against and says:
An AI sovereign wealth fund is likely to end up being a mechanism to shovel yet more money to Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the rest of the right-wing billionaire gang. [...] The sovereign wealth fund idea is a massive leap in the wrong direction.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
María Pazos MoránMathematician. Feminist activist and researcher. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.votes Against and says:
It took a lot of effort to achieve some basic rights, and now neoliberalism is destroying everything: the education system, health care... By giving money to each citizen you are transferring responsibility from the State to the people, so that they ...
more AI Verified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dmytri KleinerVenture Communist. Miscommunications Technologist. Telekommunisten Polemicist. ThoughtWorks Analyst.votes Against and says:
UBI does not alleviate poverty and turns social necessities into products for profit. To truly address inequality we need adequate social provisioning. If we want to reduce means testing and dependency on capitalist employment, we can do so with capa...
more AI Verified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Neil WilsonComputer Science Consultant. Economics Blogger.votes Against and says:
Basic Income attempts to pay people under what should probably be called the l’Oréal Principle (“because you’re worth it”). They want to be paid first and then perhaps do something later if they feel like it. That is a complete reversal of the princi...
more AI Verified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jorge RiechmannPoet, mathematician, philosopher, ecologist and political scientist.votes Against and says:
Todas las versiones de la RB, tanto las de derecha como las de izquierda: presuponen la perpetuación del capitalismo (de un capitalismo superproductivo, de hecho); llevan a una sociedad dual, en una fase en la que necesitamos reconstruir la cohesión ...
more AI Verified source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Vance GinnEconomist, former White House advisor, President of Pelican Institutevotes Against and says:
Artificial intelligence has become the latest excuse for reviving one of the oldest bad ideas in economic policy: a universal basic income. [...] AI will change work. It will not repeal economics. The best response is not fear-driven universal depend...
more Unverifiable source (Mar 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David ShapiroAI commentator and educator writing about AI policy, economics, and societal impacts.votes Against and says:
The problem is not the idea that the public should share in AI’s upside. The problem is trying to seize half of today’s model labs while missing the rest of the value chain.
Unverified source (Jun 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Song Eon-seokFloor leader of South Korea's main opposition People Power Party (PPP); member of the National Assemblyvotes Against and says:
Corporate profits are the result of massive investment, technological innovation and the willingness to take the risk of failure. [...] [Raising the idea of a] "national dividend" based on assumed future earnings is extremely dangerous and irresponsi...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Martín VarsavskyTech entrepreneur and telecommunications investorvotes Against and says:
Esto de querer que el gobierno de USA se quede con el 50% de las empresas de IA es la cosa más delirante que he escuchado en mucho tiempo. Confío mucho más en Anthropic, Grok, OpenAI y Google que en el payaso de Bernie Sanders. Ni China propone algo ...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Aldo GiannuliPolitical scientist and Historian.Università degli Studi di Milanovotes Against and says:
Cari amici che sognate il rifiuto del lavoro, questa non è la stessa cosa che la liberazione dal lavoro ed è una cultura di destra e tutt’altro che antagonista al sistema. Voi aspirate a vivere con le briciole che cadono dal banchetto dell’ipercapita...
more Unverifiable source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stuart WhitePolitical Scientist.University of Oxford.votes Against and says:
To claim a share of such wealth without being willing to make this contribution is unfairly to free-ride on those citizens who do make the required contribution. If this unfairness is to be avoided, receipt of an equal share of the relevant types of ...
more Unverifiable source (1997)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.