Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen

Cast your vote:
Results (31 votes):
Total (31 votes)
For 12 (39%) Abstain 0 (0%) Against 19 (61%)
·
  • Kevin T. Frazier
    AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas School of Law.
    votes Against and says:
    While the proposals for AI profit sharing vary in their precise details, a quick review of their likely outcomes should quickly deflate the popular excitement that has formed in response to calls for new taxes, public wealth funds, and the like.
    AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1h ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Clyde Wayne Crews
    Vice President for Policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute; policy analyst and author on regulation and technology.
    votes Against and says:
    An AI welfare state would complete the transformation from capitalism to political management via a permanent, non-reformable administrative state.
    AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Fred Ashton
    Economic policy analyst at the American Action Forum, writing on competition, technology, and regulation.
    votes Against and says:
    Direct government involvement – from inside the boardroom – in the rapidly developing AI market would undermine competition by creating a perverse set of incentives that slow innovation and rob consumers and businesses of new products.
    AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hamilton Nolan
    Labor journalist; author of the "How Things Work" newsletter and the book "The Hammer"; former writer at Gawker and In These Times
    votes Against and says:
    This is extremely dangerous. [...] Because, by promoting in the American public the idea that we all have a direct stake in the economic success of these companies, a sovereign wealth fund encourages everyone to think not as citizens, but as investor...
    more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Tad DeHaven
    Policy analyst at the Cato Institute focusing on taxation, budgets, and government intervention.
    votes Against and says:
    Sanders’s AI sovereign wealth fund should be rejected, but so should the Trump precedents greasing the skids for it.
    AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2d ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Samuel Hammond
    Director of AI Policy and Chief Economist at the Foundation for American Innovation
    votes Against and says:
    Even if taking partial ownership of frontier AI companies can make sense on paper, in practice it's a recipe for political favoritism and corruption.
    AI Verified source (2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • votes Against and says:
    Stock is private property, and seizing 50% of the stock value of major firms is a pretty obvious case of confiscation. [...] It does not matter that Sanders proposes to take "only" 50% of the stock, rather than 100%. If the government seizes half you...
    more AI Verified source (2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Jeong Hee-yong
    Secretary-General of South Korea's People Power Party (PPP); member of the National Assembly
    votes Against and says:
    [The national dividend proposal is] an anti-market idea that goes against market principles and is no different from socialist-style distribution.
    AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Dean Baker
    Economist; co-founder and senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)
    votes Against and says:
    An AI sovereign wealth fund is likely to end up being a mechanism to shovel yet more money to Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the rest of the right-wing billionaire gang. [...] The sovereign wealth fund idea is a massive leap in the wrong direction.
    AI Verified source (2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • María Pazos Morán
    Mathematician. Feminist activist and researcher. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    votes Against and says:
    It took a lot of effort to achieve some basic rights, and now neoliberalism is destroying everything: the education system, health care... By giving money to each citizen you are transferring responsibility from the State to the people, so that they ...
    more AI Verified source (2016)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Dmytri Kleiner
    Venture Communist. Miscommunications Technologist. Telekommunisten Polemicist. ThoughtWorks Analyst.
    votes Against and says:
    UBI does not alleviate poverty and turns social necessities into products for profit. To truly address inequality we need adequate social provisioning. If we want to reduce means testing and dependency on capitalist employment, we can do so with capa...
    more AI Verified source (2016)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • votes Against and says:
    Basic Income attempts to pay people under what should probably be called the l’Oréal Principle (“because you’re worth it”). They want to be paid first and then perhaps do something later if they feel like it. That is a complete reversal of the princi...
    more AI Verified source (2016)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Jorge Riechmann
    Poet, mathematician, philosopher, ecologist and political scientist.
    votes Against and says:
    Todas las versiones de la RB, tanto las de derecha como las de izquierda: presuponen la perpetuación del capitalismo (de un capitalismo superproductivo, de hecho); llevan a una sociedad dual, en una fase en la que necesitamos reconstruir la cohesión ...
    more AI Verified source (2014)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Vance Ginn
    Economist, former White House advisor, President of Pelican Institute
    votes Against and says:
    Artificial intelligence has become the latest excuse for reviving one of the oldest bad ideas in economic policy: a universal basic income. [...] AI will change work. It will not repeal economics. The best response is not fear-driven universal depend...
    more Unverifiable source (Mar 20, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 4mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • David Shapiro
    AI commentator and educator writing about AI policy, economics, and societal impacts.
    votes Against and says:
    The problem is not the idea that the public should share in AI’s upside. The problem is trying to seize half of today’s model labs while missing the rest of the value chain.
    Unverified source (Jun 5, 2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 15min ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Song Eon-seok
    Floor leader of South Korea's main opposition People Power Party (PPP); member of the National Assembly
    votes Against and says:
    Corporate profits are the result of massive investment, technological innovation and the willingness to take the risk of failure. [...] [Raising the idea of a] "national dividend" based on assumed future earnings is extremely dangerous and irresponsi...
    more Disputed source (2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • votes Against and says:
    Esto de querer que el gobierno de USA se quede con el 50% de las empresas de IA es la cosa más delirante que he escuchado en mucho tiempo. Confío mucho más en Anthropic, Grok, OpenAI y Google que en el payaso de Bernie Sanders. Ni China propone algo ...
    more Unverifiable source (2026)
    Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • Aldo Giannuli
    Political scientist and Historian.Università degli Studi di Milano
    votes Against and says:
    Cari amici che sognate il rifiuto del lavoro, questa non è la stessa cosa che la liberazione dal lavoro ed è una cultura di destra e tutt’altro che antagonista al sistema. Voi aspirate a vivere con le briciole che cadono dal banchetto dell’ipercapita...
    more Unverifiable source (2016)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate
  • votes Against and says:
    To claim a share of such wealth without being willing to make this contribution is unfairly to free-ride on those citizens who do make the required contribution. If this unfairness is to be avoided, receipt of an equal share of the relevant types of ...
    more Unverifiable source (1997)
    Like Comment Share on X added 2y ago
    Info
    Delegate