We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Hamilton Nolan
Labor journalist; author of the "How Things Work" newsletter and the book "The Hammer"; former writer at Gawker and In These Times
This is extremely dangerous. [...] Because, by promoting in the American public the idea that we all have a direct stake in the economic success of these companies, a sovereign wealth fund encourages everyone to think not as citizens, but as investors.AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly criticizes the core mechanism in the statement: a sovereign/national fund that gives the public a direct financial stake in companies and pays broad public benefits. Calling this "extremely dangerous" and explaining that it makes people think "not as citizens, but as investors" implies opposition to the proposed AI-lab equity fund and citizen dividend as a whole.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly opposes the idea, calling it "extremely dangerous" and criticizing "a sovereign wealth fund" for making people "think not as citizens, but as investors."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the Hamilton Nolan article at the provided URL, published June 8, 2026, contains the exact opening sentence "This is extremely dangerous." and later the exact sentence beginning "Because, by promoting in the American public..."; the omission marker is therefore valid, and the post is attributed on-page to Hamilton Nolan. The stored author, date, source URL, and quote are correct. ([hamiltonnolan.com](https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/an-ai-funded-sovereign-wealth-fund))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Disputed
The cited article exists, is by Hamilton Nolan, and was published on June 8, 2026, but the submitted quote is not verbatim. The source separately says “This is extremely dangerous.” and later says “a sovereign wealth fund encourages everyone to think not as citizens, but as investors.” The submitted version replaces that wording with “[A national AI wealth fund]” and splices non-adjacent text with an ellipsis, so under a strict verbatim standard it is materially altered. ([hamiltonnolan.com](https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/an-ai-funded-sovereign-wealth-fund))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
AI Verified
Verified. The quote is attributed to Hamilton Nolan from his "How Things Work" article "An AI-Funded Sovereign Wealth Fund Is Dangerous" (2026). Direct WebFetch of the source_url returned HTTP 403, but a web search of the same article confirmed its core argument matches the quote: that a national AI wealth fund "encourages everyone to think not as citizens, but as investors" and that this is dangerous (the article's thesis/title). Author attribution is correct (Nolan is a labor journalist who wrote this piece). The vote "against" aligns with statement 452 ("Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund...") since Nolan opposes the proposal. Year 2026 is current.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 21d ago
replying to Hamilton Nolan