YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)

Avatar
VOTE “NO” ON AB 1064 AB 1064 not only BANS access of anyone under 18 to general-purpose AI or other covered products, [...]
Disputed source (Sep 3, 2025)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
votes Against
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The excerpt is real in the linked PDF, and CCIA’s library page published the item on September 3, 2025 as a CCIA-led floor alert; the stored date and PDF URL match. But the PDF itself displays multiple organization logos, and a California bill analysis characterizes the opposition language as coming from a coalition led by CCIA, not from CCIA alone. So the text is authentic, but the single-author attribution is not cleanly correct. ([ccianet.org](https://ccianet.org/library/ccia-led-floor-alert-on-ca-ab-1064/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 12d ago
Disputed The CCIA-hosted PDF contains the standalone heading "VOTE “NO” ON AB 1064" and, separately, a later heading that begins "AB 1064 not only BANS access..." on page 2. But the submitted quote combines those two passages, changes the punctuation, and cuts off the second passage after "products" even though the source continues the sentence. So the wording is based on the source, but it is not verbatim as presented. The source is on CCIA’s own site, so attribution to CCIA is plausible, but the quote itself is materially altered. ([ccianet.org](https://ccianet.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AB-1064-Floor-Alert.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
AI Verified Quote: "VOTE 'NO' ON AB 1064. AB 1064 not only BANS access of anyone under 18 to general-purpose AI or other covered products." — Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) (2025). The source URL (ccianet.org AB-1064-Floor-Alert.pdf) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the EXACT text: the floor alert is titled "VOTE 'NO' ON AB 1064 — FLOOR ALERT: AB 1064 (Bauer-Kahan) – OPPOSE" and states "AB 1064 not only BANS access of anyone under 18 to general-purpose AI or other covered products, but it also bans developers from even designing or coding such products if they could be used by minors." Author attribution is correct (CCIA, technology trade association). Vote alignment is correct: CCIA OPPOSES AB 1064, so statement #416 "Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18" (against) and #445 "Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors" (against) both correctly align with CCIA's opposition to these restrictions. Year 2025 matches the September 2025 floor alert. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 23d ago
replying to Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)