Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy

impact-on-labor ai economics policy labor-rights ai-policy ai-regulation

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Key insights

Across the supportive quotes, a recurring goal is tax neutrality so firms choose between people and machines less on tax differences and more on productivity.
Opposing quotes generally accept that workers may need help adapting to AI, but they reject taxes on AI or capital investment as the main remedy.
Several supportive quotes treat AI as a threat to fiscal systems built around wage and payroll taxes, while several opposing quotes question changing the tax base based on uncertain or exaggerated scenarios.
Even among supporters, the proposed instruments vary widely, including capital gains, wealth, excess-profit, token, compute, data center, displacement, and equity-based approaches.
A nuanced strand favors broader tax redesign rather than a single robot tax, combining concern about labor-capital imbalance with caution about blunt levies.

Arguments for

Automation tax bias

Supporters argue current tax rules burden wages and payroll more than profits, software, or equipment, giving firms a fiscal reason to replace workers with AI. They say equalizing labor and capital taxation would make adoption decisions reflect real productivity rather than tax arbitrage and would better support labor-augmenting uses of technology.

First of all, our tax system taxes wealth less than it taxes work. That's a problem. That's an even bigger problem now that AI is coming for jobs because there's basically a thumb on the scale, a subsidy in effect from the US government saying, giving you a little more reason to …

Pete Buttigieg · Aug 3, 2026 · full quote
In the United States, for example, labor income is taxed significantly more than capital income. If a business pays a worker $100, it will have to hand over as much as $30 in tax and spending obligations. But paying $100 for automation equipment leads to a tax burden of less than…

Daron Acemoglu · Jul 28, 2026 · full quote
Our tax system basically gives companies huge tax savings when they automate a job, because we currently tax wages but not AI. If you replace a worker with an AI-powered robot, you save on payroll taxes: That’s functionally a tax break. That’s wrong, and an AI tax would start to …

Greg Casar · May 28, 2026 · full quote
The right answer is the opposite and simpler: stop overtaxing labour relative to capital. Close the gap that the tax code has opened between a human and a machine, so that the choice between them is made on real productivity and not on fiscal arbitrage.

Pedro Santa-Clara · Jun 30, 2026 · full quote
The tax code in the US and many other countries places a heavier burden on firms that hire labor than on those that invest in algorithms to automate work. [...] Policymakers should aim to create a more symmetric tax structure, equalizing marginal tax rates for hiring (and trainin…

Simon Johnson · 2026 · full quote

Fiscal base preservation

A central argument is that if AI shifts income away from wages and toward capital, governments cannot keep relying mainly on labor taxes without shrinking revenue just as support needs rise. Stronger taxation of capital income, AI-linked returns, or related profits is presented as necessary to keep public finances aligned with where value is created.

Should artificial intelligence cause mass unemployment, workers will not be thrilled. But neither will the taxman, even if he hasn’t been automated. For most of the past century, rich countries have had simple rules for sharing prosperity: raise money mostly by taxing work and co…

The Economist · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote
If AI leads to a transformation, where the labor share goes down by a lot more and the capital share goes up by a lot more, you can't run the kinds of programs you're running, in terms of entitlements, without having a higher capital income tax. It's just not viable.

Gita Gopinath · 2026 · full quote
AI threatens to erode the first pillar—taxes on labor—by reducing demand for human labor across many occupations. [...] The main burden of taxation will have to shift away from labor.

Anton Korinek · 2026 · full quote
While we project that AI growth will raise revenue, without substantial changes to how the U.S. taxes capital income, the federal government will be leaving a lot of revenue on the table.

John Iselin · Jul 20, 2026 · full quote
If governments continue to rely on wage taxes while fewer people earn wages, the system will stop working properly. Changing how profits are taxed helps ensure tax revenue continues to align with where the money is actually being made.

Andrew Pery · May 7, 2026 · full quote

Broader sharing of gains

Another case is that AI will increase capital's share of income and concentrate wealth among investors and large firms unless its gains are taxed more heavily. Proponents therefore back higher taxes on capital gains, excess profits, windfalls, or similar returns so the benefits of AI are shared more broadly rather than deepening inequality.

The AI economy should not become another engine for inequality. The wealthiest beneficiaries of AI should pay their fair share just like working people do.

Edward J. Markey · Jul 10, 2026 · full quote
What is reasonable to assume is that with AI, the share of gross domestic product that goes to capital will increase at the expense of the share that goes to labor. There will be fewer workers needed for the same level of production. This can only increase inequality, since capit…

Branko Milanovic · Jun 22, 2026 · full quote
AI will favor capital over labor in the historical capital versus labor battle, and so there’s no reason in the AI age to have a capital gains tax that’s different than ordinary income tax.

Vinod Khosla · Mar 24, 2026 · full quote
Labor income is subject to both payroll and income taxes and has high tax compliance rates due to third-party reporting. Capital income, including income from excess profits, is often lightly taxed in the United States and has lower compliance. [...] While labor income is already…

Kimberly Clausing · Jun 2026 · full quote
In the AI era, a portion of excess profits should be returned to the entire public.

Kim Yong-beom · May 13, 2026 · full quote

Transition and income support

Many supporters tie new taxes directly to worker protection, arguing that companies building or benefiting from AI should help finance retraining, public employment, redeployment grants, or longer-term income support. In this view, taxing AI-related capital is a way to prepare communities and workers for disruption instead of leaving the costs with displaced workers and localities.

Corporations are already laying off workers and raking in the profits from AI systems trained on human work – without ensuring workers share in those gains. That's why Congress needs to act now by preparing the economy for AI, creating guardrails so it augments workers instead of…

Sara Jacobs · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
The legislation would dedicate revenue generated by limiting bonus depreciation for AI data center infrastructure to a National Workforce Transition Fund supporting worker retraining, individual workforce training accounts, employer retention and redeployment grants, tuition assi…

Mark Warner · Jul 21, 2026 · full quote
And much of the data center buildout is to advance new technologies that could lead to substantial workforce upheaval. The U.S. has been caught flat-footed in the past by the labor impact of major technological shifts. This time, we need to be ready. To address the impacts on com…

Senate Finance Committee Democratic Staff · Aug 5, 2026 · full quote
American communities are rightfully questioning whether the rapid buildout of data centers across the nation will benefit them, as local disruptions rise and Americans grow concerned about the long-term career prospects of millions of workers. These proposals are a first step tow…

Ron Wyden · Aug 6, 2026 · full quote
If AI-driven labor displacement ends up being large in magnitude and permanently drives down the demand for labor, it will likely be necessary to go beyond mere incentive programs to long-term income support for a significant fraction of the labor force. Mechanisms such as univer…

Dario Amodei · Jun 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Investment and competitiveness risks

Opponents argue that heavier taxes on capital, compute, data centers, or other AI-related investment would reduce returns to productive investment and slow innovation and productivity growth. They warn that deliberately raising these costs could also weaken competitiveness in an international environment where others are investing aggressively.

Higher taxes on capital income reduce the return on investment, weakening firms' incentives to invest in AI infrastructure, advanced equipment, and productivity-enhancing technologies, which in a global environment where countries such as China are aggressively investing in AI co…

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation · 2026 · full quote
Raising the cost of all those innovation- and productivity-enhancing uses of computing would unequivocally harm American productivity, innovation, and global competitiveness. Knowingly imposing these costs on ourselves because of concerns about certain disruptive consequences of …

Max Gulker · Jun 2, 2026 · full quote
We should not respond to AI by taxing capital, compute, data centers, or other forms of productive investment more heavily. And we definitely should not pretend that taxing servers, chips, algorithms, or machine-intensive infrastructure solves the deeper problem.

Vance Ginn · Apr 28, 2026 · full quote
Why pick on robots? [...] I don't think simply trying to resist or stop technology is a viable strategy. I don't think it would be a viable strategy if it was adoptable on a global basis, but it's even less viable for a single country in international competition. A sufficiently …

Lawrence Summers · 2017 · full quote

Adaptation over deterrence

Another objection is that policy should help workers adjust to AI rather than try to slow AI's development through taxes. These voices favor wider diffusion of AI, worker training, unemployment and adjustment reforms, and related transition policies instead of targeted taxes on compute or capital.

Policymakers should not focus on slowing the development of AI through an AI compute tax; they should focus on helping workers transition to a labor force increasingly augmented by AI.

Meghan Ostertag · Jun 8, 2026 · full quote
As such, policymakers should refrain from changing the tax base on the assumption that labor income will decline while corporate capital gains increase. Instead, they should focus on diffusing AI across the economy to ensure U.S. businesses remain globally competitive and on supp…

Trelysa Long · May 14, 2026 · full quote
Policymakers should not adopt tax policies designed for outlandish AI technology scenarios, but some policies are justified regardless of scenario, such as shifting to consumption-based taxation and reforming unemployment insurance and the tax treatment of worker training.

Alex Muresianu · Feb 3, 2026 · full quote
One approach gaining support is to slow the displacement of workers with new taxes on AI services and investments. [...] The challenge these proposals aim to address is real — but trying to hold back the tide is the wrong answer.

Bloomberg Opinion Editors · 2026 · full quote

Misdiagnosis and poor targeting

Some critics dispute the underlying diagnosis that capital is undertaxed relative to labor in a way that explains worker losses, or say capital taxation is ill-suited when capital is mobile and self-replicating. Others argue that if the aim is to change firms' automation choices, only a more direct tax on automation would alter the calculus, not a broad tax shift toward capital.

The proposals differ in detail, but they cite the same story: Labor’s share of national income has declined, and AI is accelerating workers’ losses by shifting more economic activity to capital. The tax code makes all of this worse by undertaxing capital relative to labor. Every …

Adam Michel · Jun 18, 2026 · full quote
The features of AI that people worry about (easy substitution between capital and labor, mobile capital, self-replicating infrastructure) are exactly the features that make capital taxation counterproductive.

Brian Albrecht · Jun 18, 2026 · full quote
“Out of six popular policy fixes, we find that five of them fail,” says Tsoukalas. “In our model, only a tax on automation itself actually changes the calculus. Most of the policy debate assumes displacement will happen and focuses on picking up the pieces. That’s all necessary, …

Gerry Tsoukalas · Jun 10, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Broader tax redesign

Some sources stop short of endorsing a single AI tax and instead treat the issue as broader tax-base redesign as labor income becomes less central. They emphasize options such as narrowing the labor-capital gap, strengthening capital income taxation with safeguards, shifting some revenue toward consumption, or using targeted levies, while avoiding blunt robot taxes.

To date, BPC has not taken a position on whether AI should be taxed and does not endorse any particular option in this issue brief. [...] The code treats labor and capital differently: Employers owe payroll taxes on wages, while investments in equipment and software receive more …

Bipartisan Policy Center · Aug 24, 2026 · full quote
Avoiding blunt “robot taxes,” strengthening capital income taxation at the individual level with safeguards against base erosion, and leveraging AI to improve compliance and enforcement are important across scenarios.

International Monetary Fund · 2026 · full quote
Because effective tax rates on labor substantially exceed those on capital, a shift in national income from labor toward capital means the current tax system captures a shrinking share of a growing economy, even as the cost of sustained income support rises. Potential revenue sou…

Anthropic · Jun 2026 · full quote
As labor income taxation becomes less viable, the primary lesson is that consumption taxation must carry more fiscal weight. This shift aligns naturally with pro-innovation policies, as consumption taxes avoid penalizing the capital investments essential for future innovation. [.…

Anton Korinek · 2026 · full quote

Participants broadly agree that AI could alter how work, income, and tax revenues are distributed, but they diverge sharply on what that implies for tax policy. Supporters favor shifting more of the tax burden toward capital or AI-linked returns to correct incentives, preserve revenue, and fund adjustment, while critics warn that doing so would deter investment and prefer adaptation-focused policies or other tax bases instead. Much of the remaining disagreement concerns how large the labor shift will be and which tax instruments, if any, can respond without blunting innovation.

Cast your vote:

Results (104 votes):

Total (104 votes)

For 92 (88%) Abstain 1 (1%) Against 11 (11%)

For (90)

Alessandro Crimi
Professor at AGH University of Krakow; researcher in AI, computer science, and health economics.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

With AI, although potential compensatory mechanisms such as new tasks and productivity gains are promised, history cautions us that such benefits are neither automatic nor equitably shared. [...] Prominent tax scholars have argued that a new, targete...
more AI Verified source (Sep 18, 2026)

added 21d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sumeyye Tuncer
Public-economics writer and publisher of My Economics Diary.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We should first ask why the tax system may make employing people more expensive than using machines. The answer may not be a new tax on robots. Instead, governments could reduce the tax burden on workers, tax capital income and excess profits more ef...
more AI Verified source (Aug 28, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Oren Etzioni
AI2 founder; UW professor

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Here’s where I net out: equalize the tax treatment of labor and capital, which Congress could do next session, and route the proceeds into retraining and into topping up the pay of workers who land in lower-paying jobs.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bill Gates
Philanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I believe we should tax AI tokens and robots. [...] The tax system nudges you toward replacing people with machines.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Daryl Spence
Economist at Capital Group with more than three decades covering the U.S. economy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The ones that might change the incentive structure is you could tax capital, obviously, make capital more expensive, rather relative to labor. I don't know if that's a compute tax or an AI tax, or something like that, that would slow probably the dis...
more AI Verified source (Aug 25, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
Nonpartisan nonprofit tax-policy research organization.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The report doesn’t endorse a single “AI tax.” Instead, it lays out three broad ways Congress could use the tax code as AI creates enormous new wealth while potentially displacing workers and imposing new costs on communities: Make sure the economic g...
more AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paul Krugman
Nobel Prize–winning economist and research professor at the City University of New York’s Graduate Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Furthermore, the rise of AI, which appears to reduce the need for workers while requiring huge capital investments both in software and in physical assets such as datacenters, power supplies, and advanced chips, may cause a further large shift in inc...
more AI Verified source (Aug 9, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sara Jacobs
U.S. Representative from California's 51st congressional district

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Corporations are already laying off workers and raking in the profits from AI systems trained on human work – without ensuring workers share in those gains. That's why Congress needs to act now by preparing the economy for AI, creating guardrails so ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Valerie Foushee
U.S. Representative for North Carolina's 4th congressional district; sponsor of the Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Act

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress has a duty to ensure that this technology is not used to deepen wealth inequality, but instead that the economic benefits of AI are shared with working people. As a proud member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, I am grateful to have ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Ron Wyden
U.S. Senator from Oregon, Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee; longtime advocate for healthcare and technology policy

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

American communities are rightfully questioning whether the rapid buildout of data centers across the nation will benefit them, as local disruptions rise and Americans grow concerned about the long-term career prospects of millions of workers. These ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 6, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Senate Finance Committee Democratic Staff
Official Democratic staff of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, publishing policy analysis and proposals on tax and economic policy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

And much of the data center buildout is to advance new technologies that could lead to substantial workforce upheaval. The U.S. has been caught flat-footed in the past by the labor impact of major technological shifts. This time, we need to be ready....
more AI Verified source (Aug 5, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Pete Buttigieg
Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation; 2020 presidential candidate; Harvard Kennedy School Fellow

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

First of all, our tax system taxes wealth less than it taxes work. That's a problem. That's an even bigger problem now that AI is coming for jobs because there's basically a thumb on the scale, a subsidy in effect from the US government saying, givin...
more AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026) 1 of 2

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Ip
Chief Economics Commentator at The Wall Street Journal.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Artificial intelligence is starting to change that. More than 1,000 economists, including 17 Nobel laureates, were worried enough to sign an online petition ... warning of “large scale job displacement” from AI and pleading for action. ... [O]ne poli...
more AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)

added 12d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Ip
Chief economics commentator at The Wall Street Journal, writing on macroeconomics, economic policy, and the effects of AI on work.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Stop taxing capital more favorably than labor.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026) 1 of 3

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Douglas Elmendorf
Economist and professor at Harvard Kennedy School; former Director of the U.S. Congressional Budget Office.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

There’s a reasonable case that with the rise in AI, it’s more important to protect labor demand than to encourage more capital investment, and therefore capital taxes could be higher.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
The Economist
News and analysis with a global perspective.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Should artificial intelligence cause mass unemployment, workers will not be thrilled. But neither will the taxman, even if he hasn’t been automated. For most of the past century, rich countries have had simple rules for sharing prosperity: raise mone...
more AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Daron Acemoglu
Nobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progress

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In the United States, for example, labor income is taxed significantly more than capital income. If a business pays a worker $100, it will have to hand over as much as $30 in tax and spending obligations. But paying $100 for automation equipment lead...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Trades Union Congress (TUC)
Federation of trade unions in England and Wales representing working people.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

HMT should capture productivity gains for public use through wealth taxation, equalisation of capital gains and income tax, review incentives for investment in labour-augmenting technology, and increase the bank surcharge.
AI Verified source (Jul 22, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mark Warner
U.S. Senator from Virginia; former Governor of Virginia; Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The legislation would dedicate revenue generated by limiting bonus depreciation for AI data center infrastructure to a National Workforce Transition Fund supporting worker retraining, individual workforce training accounts, employer retention and red...
more AI Verified source (Jul 21, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
John Iselin
Economist and analyst at Yale University’s Budget Lab, researching fiscal policy and AI-driven economic change.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

While we project that AI growth will raise revenue, without substantial changes to how the U.S. taxes capital income, the federal government will be leaving a lot of revenue on the table.
AI Verified source (Jul 20, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Silviu Pitis
Writer on AI economics, taxation, and citizen-dividend policy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI threatens to move income from labor to capital faster than any technology before it. Perhaps the best response is to give citizens a direct and durable claim on the capital whose returns are replacing their wages.
AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paul Krake
Financial-market strategist, investor, and founder of View from the Peak; author of Growth Without You on AI's effects on work and wealth.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The cleanest reform is to reduce the tax penalty on labor while increasing the burden on capital-linked income.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Martha Gimbel
Executive Director and co-founder of the Budget Lab at Yale University.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We tax capital less than we tax labor in this country, and we also have many loopholes for capital taxation. [...] If some other organization is able to use AI to massively increase their profits, and fire all their workers, and they don’t hire any o...
more AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2026)

added 7d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Edward J. Markey
U.S. Senator from Massachusetts

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The AI economy should not become another engine for inequality. The wealthiest beneficiaries of AI should pay their fair share just like working people do.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Neil Duncan-Jordan
UK Member of Parliament for Poole.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The fact that our tax system taxes income from work far more heavily than income from capital gives firms a direct tax incentive to automate a worker out of a job rather than employing them, and could see AI facilitate a further shift of national inc...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026) 1 of 2

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Dr Ben Spencer
UK Conservative Member of Parliament for Runnymede and Weybridge; former NHS psychiatrist.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I also want to see us encouraging international discussion in the OECD and the United Nations about taxation—taxation of permanent establishment, capital gains and the cost of human labour compared with tokens.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Anneliese Dodds
UK Labour Member of Parliament for Oxford East; former Chair of the Labour Party.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I also want to see us encouraging international discussion in the OECD and the United Nations about taxation—taxation of permanent establishment, capital gains and the cost of human labour compared with tokens. That does not need to have an immediate...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Pedro Santa-Clara
Professor of Finance at Nova School of Business and Economics; former UCLA finance professor and NBER research associate.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The right answer is the opposite and simpler: stop overtaxing labour relative to capital. Close the gap that the tax code has opened between a human and a machine, so that the choice between them is made on real productivity and not on fiscal arbitra...
more AI Verified source (Jun 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Xavier de Souza Briggs
Senior Fellow at Brookings Metro, researching economic mobility, cities, and AI's workforce impacts.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Reforming the tax code to put the value of labor for business on a more level playing field with that of invested capital [is] an additional lever for “building pro-worker AI.”
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Abstain (1)

Bipartisan Policy Center
U.S. nonprofit think tank that develops bipartisan public-policy research and recommendations.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

abstains and says:

To date, BPC has not taken a position on whether AI should be taxed and does not endorse any particular option in this issue brief. [...] The code treats labor and capital differently: Employers owe payroll taxes on wages, while investments in equipm...
more AI Verified source (Aug 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Against (11)

Loading more opinions...

More h/impact-on-labor votes

AI will create a permanent underclass

The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity

Implement a universal basic income

AI will create more jobs than it destroys

The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth

Back