We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Daron Acemoglu
Nobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progress
In the United States, for example, labor income is taxed significantly more than capital income. If a business pays a worker $100, it will have to hand over as much as $30 in tax and spending obligations. But paying $100 for automation equipment leads to a tax burden of less than $5, a number that has dropped as companies have been allowed to write off more spending on digital infrastructure. For the most part, this tax asymmetry triggers only mediocre productivity gains. In fact, even when automated labor is less productive than human workers, a company may well make money by automating. But removing these distortions in the tax system would create a more level playing field for workers, as well as for the development of pro-worker AI models.AI Verified (Jul 28, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Acemoglu explicitly says labor is taxed far more than capital/automation and calls for removing this distortion to level the playing field for workers; this directly bears on the statement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 58min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Correct answer: for. The quote argues that labor faces much higher tax obligations than automation capital and supports removing that tax distortion for workers.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 58min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The Atlantic’s July 28, 2026 essay by Daron Acemoglu contains this passage verbatim, including the $100, $30, and less-than-$5 tax comparison.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 58min ago
replying to Daron Acemoglu