We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expert opinions on Economics
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances on Economics from AI researchers, executives and policymakers.
1367 sourced quotes · 10 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
508 opinions
For (262)McKinsey Global InstituteEconomic research institute within McKinsey & Company that publishes analysis on global economic and business issues.votes For and says:While estimates of the full impact of AI on the workforce differ widely, our base estimate indicates that automation could reduce labor demand by the equivalent of roughly 36 million jobs, while growth in the AI value chain and the broader economy co...
more AI Verified source (Sep 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (132)Jeffrey C. DixonProfessor of Sociology at the College of the Holy Cross who researches AI and work.abstains and says:Do artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT eliminate jobs, create new ones, or both? There’s a lot of speculation regarding this question, but little solid data in the U.S. to answer it.
AI Verified source (Oct 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (115)Imagining the Digital Future CenterResearch centre at Elon University studying the social impact of digital technologies and artificial intelligence.votes Against and says:In our national survey, 83% of U.S. adults expect AI to eliminate more jobs than it creates.
AI Verified source (Oct 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create a permanent underclass
225 opinions
For (49)Arielle PardesAward-winning technology journalist covering artificial intelligence and its social impacts.votes For and says:There’s a common fear among people who work in Silicon Valley: snag one of the fast-growing, high-paying jobs in artificial intelligence, or get trapped in the “permanent underclass”, a phrase describing the fate of those who won’t have upward mobili...
more AI Verified source (Oct 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (27)Adam ShawEconomics editor at the Financial Times and author of the Free Lunch newsletter.abstains and says:Though a “permanent underclass” is not an imminent reality, in the near term AI could make some people richer and others worse off.
AI Verified source (Aug 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (149)Majid RafizadehHarvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist, author, and human-rights advocate.votes Against and says:AI is expected to automate a large number of jobs. But when large numbers of people lose their means of earning a living, the situation cannot stay unbalanced forever. [...] History has repeatedly shown that societies do not stay in extreme imbalance...
more AI Verified source (Oct 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
101 opinions
For (90)Alessandro CrimiProfessor at AGH University of Krakow; researcher in AI, computer science, and health economics.votes For and says:With AI, although potential compensatory mechanisms such as new tasks and productivity gains are promised, history cautions us that such benefits are neither automatic nor equitably shared. [...] Prominent tax scholars have argued that a new, targete...
more AI Verified source (Sep 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Bipartisan Policy CenterU.S. nonprofit think tank that develops bipartisan public-policy research and recommendations.abstains and says:To date, BPC has not taken a position on whether AI should be taxed and does not endorse any particular option in this issue brief. [...] The code treats labor and capital differently: Employers owe payroll taxes on wages, while investments in equipm...
more AI Verified source (Aug 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Adam MichelDirector of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and writer on tax policy and economic growth.votes Against and says:AI will most certainly change the labor market. But it has not yet changed the complementary relationship between workers and the tools that make them more productive. Taxing the machines is simply a softer version of the Luddite English textile work...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI will create abundance
55 opinions
For (40)Greg BrockmanOpenAI cofounder; former presidentvotes For and says:Well, I do have a fundamental belief that AI is surprising. [...] I think that the way that things will change and how what we do with our time evolves and we clearly will be in a world of abundance and how do we ensure that that abundance is broadly...
more AI Verified source (Sep 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (4)Betsey StevensonLabor economist and professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan; former member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.abstains and says:The promise of artificial general intelligence is that it will provide unprecedented productivity gains that could allow all of humanity to achieve a standard of living greater than that experienced by those in the wealthiest nations.
Unverifiable source (Sep 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Daron AcemogluNobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progressvotes Against and says:AGI is generally understood as an AI system that can match or exceed human capabilities on most economically valuable tasks. In such a world, the automation of work would not be limited to specific industries or routine jobs. Instead, machines would ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity
31 opinions
For (30)Naval RavikantCEO of AngelListvotes For and says:AI isn’t going away. Barring unprecedented global government coordination, it isn’t even slowing down. The only real decision is whether to centralize power, or disperse it. Do you fear the technology? Or a small number of people controlling the te...
more AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Kai-Fu LeeAI entrepreneur and authorvotes Against and says:The “AGI-squashes-everyone” idea is unlikely, though not impossible. If American companies end up becoming dominant, my bet is that it will be because of the business ecosystems they build – not because they crossed a technological threshold that ren...
more AI Verified source (May 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (152)MetaSocial media and AI companyvotes For and says:
But each time humanity has come out with more people sharing greater prosperity, health, and freedom. We believe this will be true with AI as well, and the abundance of the future can be shared by everyone.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Implement a universal basic income
189 opinions
For (104)Nouriel RoubiniEconomist and professor emeritus at New York University’s Stern School of Business, known for analysis of global macroeconomics and financial crises.votes For and says:Eventually, we need some form of universal basic income for everybody while they work and once they retire.
AI Verified source (Jul 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Damian HindsUK Conservative Member of Parliament for East Hampshire; former Secretary of State for Education.abstains and says:Universal basic income is a policy prescription that those people calling for it tended to believe in years earlier, before they had even heard of AI, and now it fits this scenario. I do not know what the outcomes and therefore the mitigations of AI ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (83)Jean-Christophe Bélisle-PiponEthics professor at Simon Fraser University.votes Against and says:They present themselves as benefactors, they turn recipients of universal basic income into passive beneficiaries of a system they do not control and, above all, they shift the focus: Instead of questioning the concentration of capital and power, we ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Introduce a universal basic wealth system that grants individuals a capital endowment at birth
26 opinions
For (23)Nouriel RoubiniEconomist and professor emeritus at New York University’s Stern School of Business, known for analysis of global macroeconomics and financial crises.votes For and says:Eventually, we need some form of universal basic income for everybody while they work and once they retire.
AI Verified source (Jul 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Kathryn Anne EdwardsLabor economist, independent policy consultant, and co-host of the Optimist Economy podcast.votes Against and says:The answer to that fear is to make job loss less scary by building a new unemployment program.
AI Verified source (May 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.