Comment by Adam Michel

Director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and writer on tax policy and economic growth.
The proposals differ in detail, but they cite the same story: Labor’s share of national income has declined, and AI is accelerating workers’ losses by shifting more economic activity to capital. The tax code makes all of this worse by undertaxing capital relative to labor. Every part of that story is wrong.
AI Verified (Jun 18, 2026)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Michel rejects the premise that capital is undertaxed relative to labor and argues that taxing AI capital harms workers; this clearly bears on the complete tax-shift proposal. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Michel says the capital-versus-labor story and capital taxation are wrong; that implies opposition to taxing capital rather than labor as AI changes work. Recorded answer: against. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Adam Michel’s June 18, 2026 Substack article contains this wording verbatim under his byline. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2h ago
replying to Adam Michel