Expert opinions on Labor Rights

Human judgment must remain central, and workers should have recourse when automated systems affect job assignments, evaluations, or employment decisions.

Hence, under the overarching ambit of the National AI Council and together with tripartite partners, we are studying the use of AI tools by businesses and its impact on employment, before deciding the most appropriate approach for Singapore.

The requirement of human review is one of the most burdensome compliance elements for employers, particularly in comparison to states that allow alternative processes rather than human review.

Instead, we propose an alternative framework that focuses on taxing economic rents, capital income, and excess profits generated by automation, while simultaneously investing in human capital, reskilling, and innovation.

Raising the cost of all those innovation- and productivity-enhancing uses of computing would unequivocally harm American productivity, innovation, and global competitiveness. Knowingly imposing these costs on ourselves because of concerns about certa...

The AI Act Whistleblower Tool empowers individuals to securely submit a report and contribute directly to make AI in Europe safe transparent, and trustworthy. [...] Alongside with the secure tool, the AI Office commits itself to a high standard of co...

Connecticut already has strong whistleblower laws that protect employees from retaliation. [...] creating a separate, AI-specific whistleblower regime could lead to confusion, duplication, and unintended consequences for employers operating in highly...