Comment by Adam Michel

Director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and writer on tax policy and economic growth.
AI will most certainly change the labor market. But it has not yet changed the complementary relationship between workers and the tools that make them more productive. Taxing the machines is simply a softer version of the Luddite English textile workers who sought to destroy the machines that were necessary for our modern world. An AI or capital tax would fall on the very workers the policy is intended to help.
AI Verified (Jun 18, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote addresses AI’s labor effects and opposes an AI/capital tax as harmful to workers, giving a determinate position against the proposed tax shift. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Against: Michel says AI has not changed worker-tool complementarity and that AI/capital taxes would harm the workers they claim to help. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Adam Michel’s June 18 Substack post contains this exact passage under his byline. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
replying to Adam Michel

Other opinions from Adam Michel

See all

Other authors to follow