We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Bill Joy
Sun Microsystems cofounder; computer scientist
We are being propelled into this new century with no plan, no control, no brakes. Have we already gone too far down the path to alter course? I don’t believe so, but we aren’t trying yet, and the last chance to assert control—the fail-safe point—is rapidly approaching.
And yet I believe we do have a strong and solid basis for hope. Our attempts to deal with weapons of mass destruction in the last century provide a shining example of relinquishment for us to consider: the unilateral US abandonment, without preconditions, of the development of biological weapons. This relinquishment stemmed from the realization that while it would take an enormous effort to create these terrible weapons, they could from then on easily be duplicated and fall into the hands of rogue nations or terrorist groups. The clear conclusion was that we would create additional threats to ourselves by pursuing these weapons, and that we would be more secure if we did not pursue them.
AI Verified
source
(2000)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. Quote is from Bill Joy's seminal "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" article published in Wired (April 2000, Volume 8.04). Multiple sources confirm this exact quote and the biological weapons paragraph appear in that article. The vote "for" the statement "Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached" aligns with the quote's clear message advocating relinquishment of dangerous technologies. Note: Could not fetch wired.com directly (blocked), but the attribution is confirmed by multiple independent web search results. Quote is from 2000 - tried to find a recent (2025) quote from Bill Joy on this topic but could not confirm he signed the recent FLI Statement on Superintelligence.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 5d ago
replying to Bill Joy