Comment by Stuart J. Russell

This is not a ban or even a moratorium in the usual sense. It’s simply a proposal to require adequate safety measures for a technology that, according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction. Is that too much to ask?
Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified ai_verified: The quote links AI to “a significant chance to cause human extinction” and uses that risk to justify safety measures. That clearly implies the author treats AI as posing an existential threat to humanity. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote cites that the technology, "according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction," but does not unambiguously state this as the author's own position. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the exact quote is indexed on the source URL under “Stuart Russell,” and the Future of Life Institute’s official press release dated March 27, 2026 reproduces the same wording verbatim and attributes it to Stuart Russell. FLI’s official project archive lists “Statement on Superintelligence” as dated October 22, 2025, which supports the claimed year, and UC Berkeley identifies the author’s full name as Stuart J. Russell. ([superintelligence-statement.org](https://superintelligence-statement.org/?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Verified Migrated from legacy verification · Hector Perez Arenas · 8mo ago
replying to Stuart J. Russell