Comment by Sam Altman

But the governance of the most powerful systems, as well as decisions regarding their deployment, must have strong public oversight. We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. Second, we believe it would be unintuitively risky and difficult to stop the creation of superintelligence. [...] Stopping it would require something like a global surveillance regime, and even that isn’t guaranteed to work. So we have to get it right.
Verified source (2023)
Like Share on X 9mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Verified relevant. Altman says stopping superintelligence would be unintuitively risky and difficult and that AI systems should instead have public oversight, which directly opposes a ban on development until consensus is reached. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 13d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Verified against. Altman explicitly argues that stopping superintelligence would be risky and difficult rather than supporting a ban. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 13d ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly supports public, democratic control over key AI decisions: it says AI governance and deployment need 'strong public oversight' and that people should 'democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems.' That implies alignment-related choices should not be left to developers alone. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The excerpt is real on the OpenAI page: the first passage appears at line 65 and the second at line 69; the post is dated May 22, 2023. But the page’s byline lists three individual authors—Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever—so this cannot be verified here as a single-author Sam Altman quote. The supplied /blog URL also redirects to the canonical /index/governance-of-superintelligence/ page. ([openai.com](https://openai.com/blog/governance-of-superintelligence)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
Disputed The wording is real: the supplied OpenAI URL redirects to the May 22, 2023 article "Governance of superintelligence," where the first passage appears at line 65 and the second at line 69, with the ellipsis representing omitted intervening text. But the article’s author line lists Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever, so the source does not support attribution to Sam Altman alone. ([openai.com](https://openai.com/blog/governance-of-superintelligence)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
replying to Sam Altman