We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Anthony Aguirre
Physicist; Future of Life cofounder
Time is running out. The only thing likely to stop AI companies barreling toward superintelligence is for there to be widespread realization among society at all its levels that this is not actually what we want. That means building public will and scientific clarity first, and only then moving ahead on anything that would concentrate world-altering power in a machine.
This isn’t a casual slowdown; it’s an affirmative choice about what kind of future we are consenting to. If there isn’t strong public buy‑in and broad scientific consensus that it can be done safely and controllably, then pressing on would be reckless engineering and reckless governance. The right move is to hold off until those conditions are met, and to make creating those conditions the priority.
AI Verified
source
(2025)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The first paragraph is directly confirmed: Anthony Aguirre (FLI executive director) told TIME that "Time is running out" and "the only thing likely to stop AI companies barreling toward superintelligence is for there to be widespread realization among society at all its levels that this is not actually what we want." Multiple search results confirm this from the October 2025 TIME article on the FLI Statement on Superintelligence. The second paragraph reflects the Statement on Superintelligence's content (broad scientific consensus, strong public buy-in) that Aguirre helped author. Vote "for" the statement "Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached" perfectly aligns. Note: Could not fetch time.com directly (blocked) but search snippets confirm the core attribution.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 5d ago
replying to Anthony Aguirre