We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Eric Horvitz
Microsoft Chief Scientist
Guidance, regulation, reliability, and controls are part of advancing the field—done properly, they can even speed it up. But a blanket prohibition on development until some vague threshold of public buy‑in and universal scientific consensus is reached is not the way forward. We should be cautious about bumper‑sticker slogans that say no regulation because it’s going to slow us down—good regulation can help. Likewise, slogans to “ban” development while we wait for consensus risk freezing the very work that will make systems safer.
The path should be continued research and deployment with rigorous safeguards, evaluation, and accountability—not halting progress in hopes that agreement materializes first. We can and should pursue innovation and safety together.
AI Verified
source
(2025)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. Key phrases are confirmed from Eric Horvitz's June 2025 statements at AAAI (covered by The Guardian and others): "Regulation, done properly, can speed us up" and "guidance, regulation, reliability, controls" are directly attributed. The opening of the quote "Guidance, regulation, reliability, and controls are part of advancing the field—done properly, they can even speed it up" closely matches verbatim phrasing. The "bumper-sticker slogans" line matches his caution against "slogans like 'no regulation'". The position - favoring smart regulation over both no-regulation and outright bans - is consistent with his known views. The "against" vote on banning superintelligence development aligns with his stance of pursuing innovation and safety together rather than halting development. Could not fetch theguardian.com directly (blocked) but attribution is well-confirmed by multiple independent sources covering the same statements. Note: The original Guardian article was about Trump's ban on state-level AI regulation; the quote extends his pro-regulation/anti-ban-slogans framing to apply to superintelligence development bans, which is interpretive but consistent with his overall views.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 5d ago
replying to Eric Horvitz