We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (10)
ai-regulation (10)
policy (8)
ai-policy (7)
ai (5)
ai-safety (5)
regulations (5)
existential-risk (4)
international-relations (4)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-risk (3)
agi (2)
cern-for-ai (2)
ethics (2)
future (2)
Top
New
-
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
-
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
The White House and people at the top of the Pentagon seem to treat it as magic, whereas those who are actually building it realize that it hallucinates, it makes mistakes, stupid errors of reasoning. And if you put that into production, into practic...
more Unverifiable source (2026) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
And I think that even more so because we’ve seen things like some of the most recent models maybe can help people make biological weapons.
Unverified source (2025-05-31) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Algorithmic transparency. When a driverless car has an accident, or a consumer’s loan application has been denied, we should be able to ask what’s gone wrong. The big trouble with the black box algorithms that are currently in vogue is that [nobody] ...
more Unverifiable source (2024) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
In many ways, I think it’s a threat to democracy. That’s not a threat to humanity.
AI Verified source (2023-05-18) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
My opinion is that the moratorium that we should focus on is actually deployment until we have good safety cases. I don't know that we need to pause that particular project, but I do think it's emphasis on focusing more on AI safety, on trustworthy, ...
more AI Verified source (2023-05-16) -
-
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Yes, I agree [...] we need a new liability framework. [...] AI systems can produce harm at large scale [...]. Developing a framework for making companies responsible for harms [...] indirectly [...].
AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
Ultimately, we may need something like cern Global, international and neutral, but focused on AI safety rather than high energy physics.
AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
I have talked about having something like a CERN [European Organization for Nuclear Research] for AI, which might focus on AI safety. In some industries, we know how to make reliable [products], usually only in narrow domains. One example is bridges:...
more Unverifiable source (2024) 1 of 5 -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
OpenAI has also said, and I agree, “it’s important that efforts like ours submit to independent audits before releasing new systems”, but to my knowledge they have not yet submitted to such audits. They have also said “at some point, it may be import...
more Unverifiable source (2023)