We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (15)
ai-regulation (12)
policy (12)
regulations (10)
ai-policy (7)
ai-safety (7)
international-relations (6)
research-policy (6)
ai (5)
ai-ethics (5)
ethics (5)
ai-risk (4)
cern-for-ai (4)
existential-risk (4)
public-interest-ai (3)
Top
New
-
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
Algorithmic transparency. When a driverless car has an accident, or a consumer’s loan application has been denied, we should be able to ask what’s gone wrong. The big trouble with the black box algorithms that are currently in vogue is that [nobody] ... more AI Verified source (2024) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
-
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
-
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
Some of the most recent models maybe can help people make biological weapons. AI Verified source (2025) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
It should be obvious that applying hallucinatory and unreliable generative AI to weapon systems without humans in the loop could be catastrophic. [...] Paraphrasing a button that I used to wear as a teenager, one hallucination could ruin your whole p... more Unverified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
I have talked about having something like a CERN [European Organization for Nuclear Research] for AI, which might focus on AI safety. In some industries, we know how to make reliable [products], usually only in narrow domains. One example is bridges:... more AI Verified source (2024) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
Anybody's appearance can (given sufficient data) be faked now, at any time, for almost nothing. Because the tools for counterfeiting have gotten so good, 2026 will almost certainly see more deepfaked scams like this than the rest of history combined.... more Unverified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
I have talked about having something like a CERN [European Organization for Nuclear Research] for AI, which might focus on AI safety. In some industries, we know how to make reliable [products], usually only in narrow domains. One example is bridges:... more AI Verified source (2024) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
The demo was definitely proof of concept that we need to get our regulatory and technical house in order, but not the immediate threat the media and public was lead to believe. Unverified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
I think the UN, UNESCO, places like that have been thinking about this for a long time. AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
Yes, I agree [...] we need a new liability framework. [...] AI systems can produce harm at large scale [...]. Developing a framework for making companies responsible for harms [...] indirectly [...]. Unverified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus votes For and says:
Ultimately, we may need something like cern Global, international and neutral, but focused on AI safety rather than high energy physics. Unverified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus votes Against and says:
I think if you asked those questions you would say, well what society most needs is automated scientific discovery that can help us actually understand the brain to cure neural disorders, to actually understand cancer to cure cancer, and so forth. If... more AI Unverifiable source (2017) -
Gary Marcus votes Against and says:
-
Gary Marcus votes Against and says:
My opinion is that the moratorium that we should focus on is actually deployment until we have good safety cases. I don't know that we need to pause that particular project, but I do think its emphasis on focusing more on AI safety, on trustworthy, r... more AI Verified source (2023)