We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
policy (14)
×
ai-governance (13)
ai-regulation (12)
regulations (11)
ai-safety (8)
ai-policy (6)
ethics (5)
international-relations (5)
ai (4)
ai-ethics (4)
existential-risk (4)
research-policy (4)
ai-risk (3)
public-interest-ai (3)
transparency (3)
Top
New
-
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
-
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
It should be obvious that applying hallucinatory and unreliable generative AI to weapon systems without humans in the loop could be catastrophic. [...] Paraphrasing a button that I used to wear as a teenager, one hallucination could ruin your whole p... more AI Unverifiable source (2026) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Some of the most recent models maybe can help people make biological weapons. AI Verified source (2025) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
I think the UN, UNESCO, places like that have been thinking about this for a long time. AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
I have talked about having something like a CERN [European Organization for Nuclear Research] for AI, which might focus on AI safety. In some industries, we know how to make reliable [products], usually only in narrow domains. One example is bridges:... more AI Verified source (2024) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
A moratorium on Statewise regulation of AI was and is, a terrible idea, especially in a world in which there is no coherent Federal response to AI. [...] A call for federal AI standards in lieu of state standards only makes sense if there are (sensib... more AI Verified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Yes, I agree [...] we need a new liability framework. [...] AI systems can produce harm at large scale [...]. Developing a framework for making companies responsible for harms [...] indirectly [...]. Unverified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Even if a company had a product that poses clear risks, they would still be free to release it, so long as they told the government the risks. [...] There is a lot of good stuff around guidance, but I hope that we ultimately see more that is binding,... more AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Anybody's appearance can (given sufficient data) be faked now, at any time, for almost nothing. Because the tools for counterfeiting have gotten so good, 2026 will almost certainly see more deepfaked scams like this than the rest of history combined.... more AI Verified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
The demo was definitely proof of concept that we need to get our regulatory and technical house in order, but not the immediate threat the media and public was lead to believe. AI Verified source (2026) -
Gary Marcus
votes For
and says:
Ultimately, we may need something like cern Global, international and neutral, but focused on AI safety rather than high energy physics. Unverified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
I think if you asked those questions you would say, well what society most needs is automated scientific discovery that can help us actually understand the brain to cure neural disorders, to actually understand cancer to cure cancer, and so forth. If... more AI Unverifiable source (2017) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says:
My opinion is that the moratorium that we should focus on is actually deployment until we have good safety cases. I don't know that we need to pause that particular project, but I do think its emphasis on focusing more on AI safety, on trustworthy, r... more AI Verified source (2023) -
Gary Marcus
votes Against
and says: