We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Scott Wisor
Policy Director at Secure AI Project; philosopher and former professor of ethics
We polled people in Illinois, asking whether they think AI companies should be exempt from liability, and 90 percent of people oppose it. There's no reason existing AI companies should be facing reduced liability.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote attributed to Scott Wisor (Policy Director at Secure AI Project) is confirmed in coverage of Illinois SB 3444, which would shield frontier AI developers from civil liability for "critical harms." Wisor opposed OpenAI's support for the bill, citing polling that 90% of Illinois residents oppose exempting AI companies from liability. The source URL (dnyuz.com, April 10, 2026) returned 403 to WebFetch but is independently confirmed by WTL Governance, Breitbart, PPC.land, ICO Optics, and Frontierbeat. Year 2026 matches. Vote alignment: Wisor explicitly opposes reducing AI company liability ("There's no reason existing AI companies should be facing reduced liability"), which directly supports a "for" vote on "AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models."
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1d ago
replying to Scott Wisor