Scott Wisor on AI companies should be liable for harms…

Scott Wisor

Policy Director at Secure AI Project; philosopher and former professor of ethics

There’s no reason existing AI companies should be facing reduced liability.

AI Verified (Apr 9, 2026)

Source:

Scott Wisor, quoted in Maxwell Zeff, “OpenAI Backs Bill That Would Limit Liability for AI-Enabled Mass Deaths or Financial Disasters,” WIRED, April 9, 2026.

2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

votes For

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Quote is on the statement's issue and supplies a determinate stance in the cited source context. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Recorded answer 'for' matches the stance indicated by the verified quote and cited source context. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Verified verbatim against the cited source (https://www.wired.com/story/openai-backs-bill-exempt-ai-firms-model-harm-lawsuits/); attribution and stored wording match. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

replying to Scott Wisor

Other opinions from Scott Wisor

See all

Scott Wisor votes For

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

We polled people in Illinois, asking whether they think AI companies should be exempt from liability, and 90 percent of people oppose it. There's no reason existing AI companies should be facing reduced liability.

AI Verified source (2026)