YouCongress Polls

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does. Unverified source (2023)

Someday AIs really will be able to make nukes or pull off $500 million hacks. At that point, companies will have to certify that their model has been trained not to do this, and that it will stay trained. But if it were open-source, then anyone could... more Verified source (2024)

endowing rogue nations or terrorists with tools to synthesize a deadly virus. [...] keep the “weights” of the most powerful models out of the public’s hands. Unverified source (2025)

[...] open sourcing our Inspect platform. [...] shared, accessible approach to evaluations. [...] a building block for AI (Artificial Intelligence) Safety Institutes, research organisations, and academia. Unverified source (2024)

artificial intelligence companies, including his own, should be subject to mandatory testing requirements to ensure their technologies are safe for the public before release. Unverified source (2024)

Professor Geoffrey Hinton: The idea of opening up to all humanity sounds like open sourcing. It might be what I mean. But when you open source a big model and give people the weights that's not at all like open weights is not like open source. Open s... more Unverified source (2025)

there has to be full open source here. [...] if you're worried about AI-generated pathogens, [...] Let's do a Manhattan Project for biological defense. Unverified source (2023)

[...] biosecurity red‑teaming [...] revealed [...] vulnerabilities. We’ve expanded the world’s most widely used government-backed evaluation tools. These open tools [...] make safety science accessible at scale. Unverified source

We know for a fact that open-source software platforms are both more powerful and more secure than the closed-source versions. Unverified source (2024)

Some of the most recent models maybe can help people make biological weapons. Unverified source (2025)

The model card should describe: * its intended uses & potential limitations, including biases and ethical considerations [...] * the model’s evaluation results Unverified source

I have cleared [...] Inspect [...] to be open sourced. [...] to make AI (Artificial Intelligence) safe. [...] safe AI (Artificial Intelligence) will improve lives tangibly. Unverified source (2024)

But open sourcing, you know, that's just sheer catastrophe. The whole notion of open sourcing, this was always the wrong approach, the wrong ideal. There are places in the world where open source is a noble ideal and building stuff you don't understa... more Unverified source (2023)

we need to increase governance and we should consider limiting access to the large-scale generalist AI systems that could be weaponized, which would mean that the code and neural net parameters would not be shared in open-source and some of the impor... more Verified source

Meta states that it until such consensus is arrived, it will be premature to require specific measurements and benchmarks, [...]. Unverified source (2024)