Comment by Tal Feldman

Since computational infrastructure is largely open-access, decentralized, and global, regulatory chokepoints are limited. Export controls may delay access to high-performance computing, but they are unlikely to prevent the use of open-source models fine-tuned on public data. Access restrictions on commercial platforms can be circumvented by running models locally. In this environment, prevention cannot be the United States’s only strategy. Open-source PLMs are already circulating globally, making it increasingly easy for malicious actors to create pathogens. As with cybersecurity, resilience—not containment—must become the cornerstone of national biosecurity policy.
Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 9mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Verified relevant. Feldman argues open-source models are already circulating globally and resilience, not containment, must be the cornerstone of policy, opposing a ban on open-source AI models. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 14d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Verified against. Feldman explicitly argues against containment as the primary strategy and says open-source access restrictions can be circumvented. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 14d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The Lawfare source page contains these passages, but the submission is disputed because the article is co-authored by Tal Feldman and Jonathan Feldman, not Tal Feldman alone, and the stored quote is not verbatim: it omits an intervening sentence after “making it increasingly easy for malicious actors to create pathogens” without marking an omission. The page is dated July 24, 2025. ([lawfaremedia.org](https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-u.s.-cannot-prevent-every-ai-biothreat-but-it-can-outpace-them)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
Disputed Lawfare’s July 24, 2025 article does contain the first paragraph verbatim and the surrounding second-paragraph language, but the quoted version omits the sentence “What matters is how fast U.S. defense systems can respond—and whether the nation has the infrastructure in place to do so.” without marking an omission, so it is not verbatim as presented. The byline also lists two authors—Tal Feldman and Jonathan Feldman—so attributing it to Tal Feldman alone is incomplete. ([lawfaremedia.org](https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-u.s.-cannot-prevent-every-ai-biothreat-but-it-can-outpace-them)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
replying to Tal Feldman