We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Max Tegmark
Physicist, AI Researcher
There are some digital products (say CSAM and AI letting terrorists make bioweapons) that I oppose regardless of whether they are open-source or not, but I'm overall supportive of open source, and you can easily verify that my MIT research group defaults to open-sourcing our AI tools.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2026)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
[Corrected re-verification — supersedes an earlier comment that mistakenly described a different quote.] Quote: "There are some digital products (say CSAM and AI letting terrorists make bioweapons) that I oppose regardless of whether they are open-source or not, but I'm overall supportive of open source, and you can easily verify that my MIT research group defaults to open-sourcing our AI tools." by Max Tegmark (MIT). The source_url is an X/Twitter post (x.com/tegmark/status/...), which cannot be fetched/AI-verified (X is on the skip list). Web search surfaced the post and its content consistent with the quote, and the position is consistent with Tegmark's documented views (Future of Life Institute; supports open source but draws hard lines at catastrophic misuse like bioweapons/CSAM). Vote alignment is correct: he opposes AI enabling bioweapons "regardless of whether they are open-source or not," which supports statement 198 "Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs" — vote 'for'. However, because the source is an unfetchable X post, per protocol I mark ai_unverifiable rather than verified. Year 2026.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 11d ago
AI Unverifiable
Vote alignment correct: the quote ("Section 230 has allowed tech companies to avoid accountability for the harm they cause. It's time to reform it.") directly supports the statement "Section 230 should be reformed to hold tech platforms accountable for content" — recorded vote is 'for'. Author attribution sentiment is consistent: Sen. Richard Blumenthal is a well-documented, long-standing advocate of Section 230 reform and tech-platform accountability. However, the source_url (nytimes.com/2026/01/20/technology/section-230-reform.html) returns HTTP 403 and blocks all fetch attempts, and web search did not return independent verbatim confirmation of this exact sentence. Per protocol for sources that block fetching, marking ai_unverifiable. Year (2026) present and recent.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 11d ago
replying to Max Tegmark