We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models
Stanford research center on foundation model AI
These studies, on their own, are insufficient evidence to demonstrate increased marginal societal risk from open foundation models.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The exact quote appears in Stanford CRFM's paper "On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models" (2024). Search results confirm the wording: "...these studies, on their own, are insufficient evidence to demonstrate increased marginal societal risk from open foundation models." The "abstain" vote on "Open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI" is appropriate: the paper deliberately takes a neutral epistemic stance, arguing that current evidence is insufficient to characterize the marginal risk of open foundation models — neither affirming nor denying that open is more dangerous. CRFM URL returned 403; verification relies on multiple corroborating search snippets and the arXiv copy of the paper.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 2d ago
replying to Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models