We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-safety (12)
×
ai-governance (11)
ai-regulation (10)
ai-policy (8)
policy (8)
regulations (8)
ethics (4)
transparency (4)
ai-risk (3)
gov (3)
research-policy (3)
ai (2)
existential-risk (2)
future (2)
international-relations (2)
Top
New
-
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
179 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
Public input is critical to ensuring that powerful AI serves humanity’s interests.
AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2026) -
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
Our Advanced AI Framework proposes mandatory independent safety testing for frontier models, transparency requirements, and government authority to block or recall dangerous AI deployments.
AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
63 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026) -
Anthropic
votes Against
and says:
-
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
92 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
Absent a strong federal law, states should retain full authority to legislate.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
468 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
It’s built on five core principles: keeping humans in control, aligning with human values, securing agents’ interactions, maintaining transparency, and protecting privacy.
AI Verified source (Apr 9, 2026) -
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
We treat misalignment as a central, but solvable, problem for both us and for the field.
Unverifiable source (2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
155 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
If it were possible to effectively slow the development of this technology to give ourselves more time to deal with its immense implications, we think that would likely be a good thing. But if a slowdown simply lets the least cautious actors catch up...
more AI Verified source (2026) -
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
Importantly, the law balances [...] whistleblower protections—[...]. [...] Protecting whistleblowers: It should be an explicit violation of law [...] punish employees who raise concerns [...].
AI Verified source (Dec 19, 2025) -
Anthropic
votes Against
and says:
Our proposed transparency framework offers a practical first step: public visibility into safety practices while preserving private sector agility to deliver AI's transformative potential.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2025) -
-
Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority
28 opinions
Anthropic
votes For
and says:
we propose that AI developers pre-register large training runs [...] within their home country’s government [...] plausible bar for now would be 10^26 FLOP or higher.
AI Verified source (2023)