Anthropic

Public input is critical to ensuring that powerful AI serves humanity’s interests.

Frontier developers should engage at least one qualified independent evaluator to publish a review of their evaluations and risk reports. In parallel, governments and industry should develop the ecosystem of qualified independent evaluators by settin...

We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology.

Compounding the problem, labs in China often release dual-use capable models as open-weight. Once a model is open-weight, safeguards that do exist can be removed, making the model available to any state or non-state actor to use for malicious purpose...

It’s built on five core principles: keeping humans in control, aligning with human values, securing agents’ interactions, maintaining transparency, and protecting privacy.

We do not believe that today’s frontier AI models are reliable enough to be used in fully autonomous weapons. Allowing current models to be used in this way would endanger America’s warfighters and civilians.

Before approving a new model for easy or broad internal use (e.g., making the model available via our most-used internal tools), we conduct a pre-deployment review process.

We treat misalignment as a central, but solvable, problem for both us and for the field.