Comment by Anthropic

If it were possible to effectively slow the development of this technology to give ourselves more time to deal with its immense implications, we think that would likely be a good thing. But if a slowdown simply lets the least cautious actors catch up technologically, it could leave everyone less safe. [...] We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology. [...] These systems would enable frontier AI developers to verify that others globally have actually stopped or slowed, and that a bad actor could not use the auspices of a coordinated slowdown to jump ahead in secret. If such systems existed, we expect that we would slow down or temporarily pause, if other developers at or near the frontier also did so in a verifiable manner.
AI Verified source (2026)
Like 1 Share on X 2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Anthropic explicitly supports building systems enabling a globally verifiable temporary slowdown or pause of frontier AI. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 12d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly supports the statement's proposed global-slowdown capability; recorded answer 'for' is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 12d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Anthropic's official 'When AI builds itself' page contains the quoted organizational position on a verifiable coordinated frontier-AI slowdown. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 12d ago
Disputed The passage is real at the provided Anthropic URL: the quoted segments appear at lines 152-154, and the user's [...] correctly omit intervening text. But the same page says the piece was co-authored by Marina Favaro and Jack Clark, so this is not verifiable here as a single-author quote attributed to "Anthropic." ([anthropic.com](https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
Disputed The passages are present on the cited Anthropic page, and the [...] omissions are faithful: the relevant text appears in the article’s “What should we do?” section. However, the page credits Marina Favaro and Jack Clark as co-authors, so attributing the quote to “Anthropic” is not strictly correct. Because the text is real but the attribution is off, the quote should be treated as misattributed. ([anthropic.com](https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1mo ago
replying to Anthropic