Comment by Thomas Woodside

Those updates should include the results of evaluations for models that haven’t been publicly deployed yet, since those models could also pose serious risks.
AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 4mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote supports publishing evaluation results before deployment: it says updates "should include the results of evaluations for models that haven’t been publicly deployed yet." That clearly implies support for pre-deployment publication of safety evaluations, especially for risky/frontier models. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote says updates "should include the results of evaluations for models that haven’t been publicly deployed yet," which suggests publishing some pre-deployment eval results, but it does not clearly address a formal requirement on AI labs or specifically frontier-model safety evaluations. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified ai_verified: The TechCrunch article dated April 17, 2025 contains the exact sentence provided at line 131 and explicitly attributes it to Thomas Woodside as a statement he made to TechCrunch. ([techcrunch.com](https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/17/googles-latest-ai-model-report-lacks-key-safety-details-experts-say/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
replying to Thomas Woodside