We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Gary Marcus
Professor of Psychology and Neural Science
Plot the same improvements on a linear y-axis and you get steady incremental gains, impressive but not the hockey stick that triggered the panic. [...] We don't have evidence that Mythos is actually an important step towards broad superintelligence.Disputed source (2026)
20d ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history
Unverified
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history
Unverified
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Verification History
Disputed
The source page is real and dated May 10, 2026, but the supplied passage is not a verbatim Gary Marcus quote. In the article body, Marcus writes the part about lacking evidence that Mythos is an important step toward broad superintelligence; the linear-y-axis / hockey-stick sentence appears instead in a separate comment by Scenarica, which the page labels only as “Liked by Gary Marcus.” That makes the provided quote a composite and misattributed to Marcus. ([garymarcus.substack.com](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/misplaced-panic-over-ai-progress))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 1d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Gary Marcus (Professor of Psychology and Neural Science, prominent AI skeptic), year 2026. Source URL (garymarcus.substack.com/p/misplaced-panic-over-ai-progress) returned HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but two web searches confirmed both fragments verbatim: "Plot the same improvements on a linear y-axis and you get steady incremental gains, impressive but not the hockey stick that triggered the panic" and "we don't have evidence that Mythos is actually an important step towards broad superintelligence" — both from Marcus's recent Substack post "Misplaced panic over AI progress" at the exact source URL. Author attribution correct and consistent with Marcus's well-known skepticism. The [...] elision is valid. Vote alignment correct: statement "AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence" is voted "against," matching the quote downplaying the idea that current systems are an important step toward superintelligence.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 20d ago
replying to Gary Marcus