Amy Bos on Mandate third-party audits for major AI…

Amy Bos

Vice President of Government Affairs

Illinois SB 315’s mandatory third-party AI audit requirement creates an impossible compliance burden — there are no recognized auditing standards, certified auditors or established methodologies for frontier model safety audits, yet companies would face penalties up to $3 million for noncompliance by January 2028. [...] Companies cannot comply with auditing standards that do not yet exist.

AI Verified source (May 26, 2026)

4mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems

votes Against

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified The quote directly addresses a mandatory third-party AI audit requirement and argues against it, calling it an "impossible compliance burden" because standards, auditors, and methodologies do not exist. That clearly implies opposition to mandating third-party audits for major AI systems. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified The quote clearly opposes a mandatory third-party audit requirement, calling it an "impossible compliance burden" and saying "Companies cannot comply with auditing standards that do not yet exist." · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Verified. The NetChoice page at the provided URL is dated May 26, 2026 and names Amy Bos as the author. It contains the first sentence verbatim in the page summary and the second sentence verbatim in the testimony body: “Companies cannot comply with auditing standards that do not yet exist.” The ellipsis is a faithful omission of intervening text from the same authored source, so the stored quote, author, date, and source URL are consistent with the evidence. ([netchoice.org](https://netchoice.org/netchoice-testimony-in-opposition-to-illinois-sb-315-the-artificial-intelligence-safety-measures-act/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

Disputed The NetChoice page from May 26, 2026 has the opening passage in its summary, but in the source that sentence continues past the point where your version stops; the later sentence about companies being unable to comply with nonexistent auditing standards appears separately in the body, and the page is signed by Amy Bos for NetChoice. Because the submitted text is a stitched-together excerpt rather than a fully verbatim quote as presented, I classify it as disputed. ([netchoice.org](https://netchoice.org/netchoice-testimony-in-opposition-to-illinois-sb-315-the-artificial-intelligence-safety-measures-act/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3mo ago

AI Verified Quote attributed to NetChoice from its "Testimony in Opposition to Illinois SB 315, the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act" (2026). The source_url (netchoice.org) returns HTTP 403 for automated fetch, but a web search confirmed the quote's substance and key wording verbatim: NetChoice argues there are "no recognized auditing standards, certified auditors or established methodologies for frontier model safety audits" and that the mandatory third-party audit requirement creates an "impossible compliance" obligation, concluding companies cannot comply with standards that do not yet exist. Year (2026) and attribution are correct. The "against" vote on "Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems" aligns directly — NetChoice's testimony explicitly opposes the mandatory third-party AI audit requirement and urges removing the audit provisions. Positive evidence confirms accuracy and vote alignment. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 4mo ago

replying to Amy Bos

Other opinions from Amy Bos

See all

Amy Bos votes Against

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

Under this standard, a company updating safety features or fixing security vulnerabilities becomes fully liable for completely unforeseeable consequences of those updates.

AI Verified source (May 12, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Amy Bos votes Against

Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18

NetChoice implores the Senate Judiciary Committee to safeguard Americans’ most secure documents and reject the GUARD Act. If implemented, such a broad and vague provision would force AI companies to collect and store highly sensitive personal data in...

more AI Verified source (Apr 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Amy Bos votes Against

States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government

We obviously strongly, strongly believe AI doesn’t stop at state borders and AI policies shouldn’t either. So we really need explicit, federal preemption of conflicting state laws — one national standard.

AI Verified source (Mar 3, 2026)

added 1mo ago