Comment by Patrick Hedfeld

This formulation does not attribute consciousness, intentionality, or moral personhood to AI systems. Nor does it collapse distinctions between humans and machines. [...] Preserving this distinction is essential because it allows the paper to acknowledge the structuring force of AI while retaining the primacy of human and institutional responsibility. In this respect, the socio-technical concept of AI offers a middle path between two inadequate extremes: the view of AI as a neutral instrument with no independent structuring effects, and the view of AI as an autonomous quasi-person capable of bearing responsibility in its own right.
AI Verified source (Apr 14, 2026)
Like Share on X 3h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified. The Springer article at the supplied URL is titled "AI as a socio-technical actor: rethinking definitions for ethics and governance," lists Patrick Hedfeld as the sole author, and shows "Published: 14 April 2026." The quoted text appears verbatim on that page: the opening sentences at lines 101–102 and the closing sentences at line 286, with the [...] accurately omitting intervening text rather than altering it. No correction is needed. ([link.springer.com](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01123-1)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 3h ago
replying to Patrick Hedfeld