We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David Feith
Senior Fellow at Hudson Institute; former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and National Security Council official
These officials and scientists knew that COVID may have come from a lab, they knew that a lab leak could have resulted from research in Wuhan funded by the U.S. Government [...] The misdirection tactics worked. The lab leak theory became stigmatized, driven underground, and yet evidence continued to mount in its favor.AI Verified (Apr 18, 2023)
2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Relevant: the quote is directly about the statement’s core issue—whether COVID originated from a lab-related incident—and says officials knew it may have come from a lab and that evidence kept mounting in favor of the lab-leak theory. In source context, this makes a pro-lab-origin stance substantially more likely than opposition or abstention. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg51891/html/CHRG-118hhrg51891.htm))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
He is arguing for the lab-origin side: he says officials knew COVID "may have come from a lab," that the "lab leak theory" was stigmatized even as "evidence continued to mount in its favor," and the source context adds that State flagged information underscoring the plausibility of a lab leak. That implies support for a lab-related origin over natural spillover, even if he stops short of absolute proof. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg51891/html/CHRG-118hhrg51891.htm))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote is authentic. The official govinfo hearing transcript for April 18, 2023 identifies the speaker as "STATEMENT OF DAVID FEITH," and it contains the exact wording: "These officials and scientists knew that COVID may have come from a lab, they knew that a lab leak could have resulted from research in Wuhan funded by the U.S. Government ... The misdirection tactics worked. The lab leak theory became stigmatized, driven underground, and yet evidence continued to mount in its favor." The submitter's [...] is a valid omission of intervening sentences, not an alteration. The stored author, date, and source URL are consistent with the canonical source. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg51891/html/CHRG-118hhrg51891.htm))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 2h ago
replying to David Feith