Comment by Tom_Featherbottom

Reddit commenter participating in r/science discussions about COVID-19 origins and infectious-disease consensus.
There is a consensus among infectious disease scientists of zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2.
AI Verified (Mar 10, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Relevant: the quote directly addresses the statement’s central origin question by asserting that SARS-CoV-2 is understood to have a zoonotic origin, and in the thread it is posted as a response to whether there is consensus on that exact subject. That makes a stance against the lab-incident claim substantially more likely. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1rpkoz1/recent_pandemic_viruses_jumped_to_humans_without/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The author is opposing the lab-origin claim: they say, "There is a consensus among infectious disease scientists of zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2," and in context this is a direct reply to someone saying there is no consensus, so the author is affirming natural spillover rather than a lab-related origin. ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1rpkoz1/recent_pandemic_viruses_jumped_to_humans_without/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified. The Reddit thread page contains a comment by Tom_Featherbottom with the exact text: There is a consensus among infectious disease scientists of zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2. The comment permalink JSON also matches verbatim and attributes it to author "Tom_Featherbottom" with created_utc 1773110546, which is 2026-03-10 UTC, so the stored author, content, date, and source are consistent. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to Tom_Featherbottom