Comment by John Villasenor

UCLA professor; Brookings senior fellow
Regardless of what policies the U.S. adopts, the technology of large AI systems is going to continue to advance at a global level. It is far better for the U.S. to remain at the forefront of AI—advancing the state of the art, and using that knowledge to better identify and mitigate risks—than for the U.S. government to attempt to impose a legally dubious, unenforceable, and easily circumvented nationwide halt on work on training large AI systems.
AI Verified (Apr 11, 2023)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly argues against a nationwide pause/moratorium on large AI training, so the statement is clearly on-topic. gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 55min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote rejects a nationwide moratorium as legally dubious and easily circumvented, so the recorded 'against' answer matches. gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 55min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Brookings article on the moratorium includes the same wording about a 'legally dubious, unenforceable, and easily circumvented' nationwide halt (lines 165-188). gpt-5 · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 56min ago
replying to John Villasenor