Comment by Norman J. Temple

Athabasca University nutrition methodology researcher and author of a 2025 Nutrients perspective on confounding and other problems in nutrition research.
However, residual confounding is always possible in observational studies. In summary, confounding can easily lead to false associations (“guilt—or innocence—by association”).
AI Verified (Mar 10, 2025)
Like Share on X 2h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Temple's source says residual confounding remains possible in observational studies and can produce false associations; this directly supports the linked statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer is for: Temple says observational studies can retain residual confounding and yield false associations, supporting the linked claim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified MDPI article by Norman J. Temple, published 10 Mar 2025, contains this wording verbatim in its confounding section. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 1h ago
replying to Norman J. Temple