We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Cynthia Rudin
Duke professor, interpretable ML advocate
Black box machine learning models are currently being used for high stakes decision-making throughout society, causing problems throughout healthcare, criminal justice, and in other domains. People have hoped that creating methods for explaining these black box models will alleviate some of these problems, but trying to explain black box models, rather than creating models that are interpretable in the first place, is likely to perpetuate bad practices and can potentially cause catastrophic harm to society. There is a way forward -- it is to design models that are inherently interpretable. This manuscript clarifies the chasm between explaining black boxes and using inherently interpretable models, outlines several key reasons why explainable black boxes should be avoided in high-stakes decisions, identifies challenges to interpretable machine learning, and provides several example applications where interpretable models could potentially replace black box models in criminal justice, healthcare, and computer vision.Verified source (2018)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The quote is authentic. It appears in the abstract of the arXiv paper titled "Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead," and the arXiv record attributes the paper to Cynthia Rudin. The record shows it was first submitted on November 26, 2018. The supplied text matches the abstract verbatim apart from harmless formatting/typography differences (e.g., italics in the source and dash style). ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
replying to Cynthia Rudin