We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Mozilla
Open-source web nonprofit
In their report, NTIA rightly notes that “current evidence is not sufficient to definitively determine either that restrictions on such open-weight models are warranted or that restrictions will never be appropriate in the future.” Instead of recommending restrictions, NTIA suggests that the government “actively monitor…risks that could arise from dual-use foundation models with widely available model weights and take steps to ensure that the government is prepared to act if heightened risks emerge.”
NTIA’s recommendations for collecting and evaluating relevant evidence include support for external research, increasing transparency, and bolstering federal government expert capabilities. We welcome this approach, and in our comments we called for governments to play a role in “promoting and funding research”; we agree that it will help us all better understand and navigate the AI landscape.
AI Verified
source
(2024)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote text confirmed via web search (Mozilla blog blocks WebFetch with 403). The phrases "current evidence is not sufficient to definitively determine either that restrictions on such open-weight models are warranted" and "actively monitor...risks that could arise from dual-use foundation models with widely available model weights" match the NTIA quotes that Mozilla cites in their August 2024 blog post welcoming NTIA's approach. Vote "against" aligns with the statement "Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs" — Mozilla welcomed NTIA's recommendation against restrictions on open-weight models. Year 2024 is acceptable as this is a specific historical commentary on NTIA's report. Source URL is the primary source (Mozilla's own blog post).
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 15d ago
replying to Mozilla