Comment by Leopold Aschenbrenner

On the current course, the leading Chinese AGI labs won’t be in Beijing or Shanghai—they’ll be in San Francisco and London. In a few years, it will be clear that the AGI secrets are the United States’ most important national defense secrets—deserving treatment on par with B-21 bomber or Columbia-class submarine blueprints, let alone the proverbial “nuclear secrets”—but today, we are treating them the way we would random SaaS software. At this rate, we’re basically just handing superintelligence to the CCP. And this won’t just matter years in the future. Sure, who cares if GPT-4 weights are stolen—what really matters in terms of weight security is that we can secure the AGI weights down the line, so we have a few years, you might say. (Though if we’re building AGI in 2027, we really have to get moving!) But the AI labs are developing the algorithmic secrets—the key technical breakthroughs, the blueprints so to speak—for the AGI right now (in particular, the RL/self-play/synthetic data/etc “next paradigm” after LLMs to get past the data wall). AGI-level security for algorithmic secrets is necessary years before AGIlevel security for weights.
Disputed source (2024)
Like Share on X 9mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The source page does contain the first paragraph beginning “On the current course...” and the later paragraph beginning “And this won’t just matter years in the future...,” and the series is attributed on the site to “Leopold Aschenbrenner, June 2024.” However, the submitted text is not verbatim: it skips intervening text between those passages without marking an omission ([...]), and its ending differs from the source, which reads “AGI-level security for algorithmic secrets is necessary years before AGI-level security for weights.” ([situational-awareness.ai](https://situational-awareness.ai/lock-down-the-labs/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Verified via web search. Quote is from Leopold Aschenbrenner's 'Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead' (June 2024), specifically the 'IIIb. Lock Down the Labs' section. Updated source URL from third-party copy (fluidself.org) to the primary source at situational-awareness.ai/lock-down-the-labs/. The quote concerns securing AGI algorithmic secrets and weights from the CCP - aligned with Aschenbrenner's broader concerns including avoiding open-source proliferation of weights that could enable WMDs. Vote 'for' on 'Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs' is consistent with his stated worries about proliferation of super-WMDs to rogue states/terrorists if AGI is open-sourced. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Leopold Aschenbrenner