We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Elliot Jones
Ada Lovelace Institute researcher
Some advocates, such as computer scientist Gary Marcus, also argue that the CERN model could help advance AI safety research beyond the capacity of any one firm or nation. The new institution could bring together top talent under a mission grounded in principles of scientific openness, adherence to a pluralist view of human values (such as the collective goals of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development), and responsible innovation. Similar sentiments have been repeated by other prominent actors in the AI governance ecosystem, including Ian Hogarth, chair of the UK’s AI Safety Institute, who argues that an international research institution offers a way to ensure safer AI research in a controlled and centralized environment without being driven by profit motive. [...] A publicly funded international research organization conducting safety research might be more resilient than private sector labs to economic pressures, and better able to avoid the risk of profit-seeking motives overriding meaningful research into AI safety measures.Verified source (Jun 7, 2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Yes. The quote is about an international, publicly funded AI research institution in the CERN model and presents reasons it would improve AI safety and reduce profit-driven pressures. That clearly implies support for creating a global AI institute like CERN.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
No vote answer verification comments yet.
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote to verify yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The supplied URL contains both passages verbatim (with your [...] omission allowed): the first appears at lines 632–633 and the second at line 638. However, the section page is attributed to Elliot Jones, not to Chatham House, and the page shows the paper was published on 7 June 2024 (updated 10 June 2024), so the stored author and date are not the canonical values. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/artificial-intelligence-and-challenge-global-governance/02-cern-ai-what-might-international))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
The quoted passages are present, essentially verbatim, on the cited Chatham House page: the first excerpt appears at lines 632–633, and the second at line 638. However, that specific section is credited to Elliot Jones (“02 A ‘CERN for AI’ – what might an international AI research organization address?”), not to Chatham House as the author. So the quote is real, but the attribution given here is materially incorrect. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/artificial-intelligence-and-challenge-global-governance/02-cern-ai-what-might-international))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
replying to Elliot Jones