We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Elliot Jones
Ada Lovelace Institute researcher
Researchers have also raised concerns that giving a centralized institution access to the advanced AI models of leading labs might compromise the security of those labs and models. For example, effective access to design evaluations and benchmarks may require the ability to copy a given model, which could undermine the commercial interests of those labs and enable diffusion of those models before adequate testing. This may be less of an issue for mechanistic interpretability and similar research, which may not require access to the latest models. Lastly, a CERN for AI would have to grapple with rising geopolitical tensions. It is arguably harder today to start an international governance body than it was in the era immediately after the Second World War. Most leading AI labs are based in the US and China, two countries that are arguably engaged in a ‘new cold war’ that is fuelling a technological arms race between them.AI Verified source (Jun 7, 2024)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The passage is authentic: it appears verbatim on Chatham House’s section page “02 A ‘CERN for AI’ – what might an international AI research organization address?”, and that page lists Elliot Jones as the section author; the collection page shows the work was published on 7 June 2024. The stored author, date, source page, and quote text all match the available evidence. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/artificial-intelligence-and-challenge-global-governance/02-cern-ai-what-might-international))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
The passage appears verbatim at the cited Chatham House page: the first paragraph is in lines 656–657 and the second in line 658; the same text also appears in the Chatham House PDF on page 18, lines 667–676. However, the essay/section is specifically credited to Elliot Jones, so attributing the quote to “Chatham House” as the author is not the precise authorship attribution. ([chathamhouse.org](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/artificial-intelligence-and-challenge-global-governance/02-cern-ai-what-might-international))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote text matches verbatim content from the Chatham House 2024 essay "A 'CERN for AI' – what might an international AI research organization address?" at the cited source_url (chathamhouse.org returned 403 to direct WebFetch, but Google's indexed snippet of that exact URL returned the quote text word-for-word, including the passages on centralized institutions compromising security and the geopolitical 'new cold war' framing). Vote alignment is correct: the quote raises concerns about giving a centralized institution access to leading labs' models (security risks, undermining commercial interests, geopolitical tensions), which supports an "against" vote on the statement "The CERN for AI should have a central hub in one location." Author attribution is appropriate — Chatham House is the publisher of this essay collection. Year is 2024; searched for a more recent Chatham House statement on the same specific question (central hub location) but found no superseding position, so the 2024 source remains canonical.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Elliot Jones