Comment by Geoffrey Hinton

It’s research but only the big companies have the resources to do this research because it’s research on the large cutting edge models. My belief is that government’s the only people who are powerful enough to deal with these large companies and even they may not be. My belief is the government ought to mandate that they spend a certain fraction of their computing resources on safety research. Now it would be great if that happened. [...] I find it very hard to keep up with what’s happening. There’s new models coming out every day and there’s new techniques being invented every day because there’s a very large number of very smart people working on it now. I find that scary. So it will be hard to regulate. But if you say something like spend a third of your computing resources on AI safety research, that’s sort of more generic and easier to do.
AI Unverifiable source (2025)
Like 1 Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/podcast/) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden via WebFetch, blocking AI access. The quote content is consistent with Hinton's widely-reported, public position: web search confirmed he has advocated that governments mandate AI companies spend "a third" of computing resources on AI safety research, including via the joint paper with Bengio and 22 other experts. The vote "for" correctly aligns with the statement "Mandate big AI companies spend 30% of compute on AI safety" since the quote explicitly proposes "spend a third of your computing resources on AI safety research." Year 2025 is plausible (Nobel Prize was 2024, podcast/follow-up coverage in 2025). Cannot positively verify the exact text against the primary source due to access block. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Geoffrey Hinton