Comment by Geoffrey Hinton

It’s research but only the big companies have the resources to do this research because it’s research on the large cutting edge models. My belief is that government’s the only people who are powerful enough to deal with these large companies and even they may not be. My belief is the government ought to mandate that they spend a certain fraction of their computing resources on safety research. Now it would be great if that happened. [...] I find it very hard to keep up with what’s happening. There’s new models coming out every day and there’s new techniques being invented every day because there’s a very large number of very smart people working on it now. I find that scary. So it will be hard to regulate. But if you say something like spend a third of your computing resources on AI safety research, that’s sort of more generic and easier to do.
AI Verified source (2025)
Like 1 Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly supports the full statement: it says the government should mandate that large AI companies spend “a certain fraction” of computing resources on “safety research,” and specifically gives “spend a third of your computing resources on AI safety research,” which matches mandating big AI companies to devote about 30% of compute to AI safety. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The quote is authentic as quoted from the official NobelPrize.org podcast transcript for Geoffrey Hinton. The page says the conversation was published on 15 May 2025, and it attributes the first passage to Hinton at line 236 and the second passage to Hinton at line 241; the ellipsis simply skips intervening transcript text. The page also notes the transcript was created with speech recognition and reviewed by human transcribers, so there is a minor transcript-error caveat, but the wording on the source page matches the quote given. ([nobelprize.org](https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/podcast/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Unverifiable Source URL (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/podcast/) returns HTTP 403 Forbidden via WebFetch, blocking AI access. The quote content is consistent with Hinton's widely-reported, public position: web search confirmed he has advocated that governments mandate AI companies spend "a third" of computing resources on AI safety research, including via the joint paper with Bengio and 22 other experts. The vote "for" correctly aligns with the statement "Mandate big AI companies spend 30% of compute on AI safety" since the quote explicitly proposes "spend a third of your computing resources on AI safety research." Year 2025 is plausible (Nobel Prize was 2024, podcast/follow-up coverage in 2025). Cannot positively verify the exact text against the primary source due to access block. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Geoffrey Hinton