Comment by Nicole Grobert

Materials chemist; EU science advisor
It’s great to see this proposal is now gaining traction. We need to make sure that we think carefully about how an AI institute is designed, because it really matters. [...] It should provide fair access to massive high-performing computational power, a sustainable cloud infrastructure, funding for research with AI and AI training programmes for researchers in all disciplines to explore and adopt AI in their sciences. [...] We advised in April that a distributed model would bring many advantages and avoid some of the pitfalls of a single monolithic entity. AI Unverifiable source (2024)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (scientificadvice.eu page on 'CERN for AI: the devil is in the detail') returns HTTP 403 from WebFetch. Web search confirms the page exists and the quoted content matches Nicole Grobert's April/2024 commentary as Chair of the EU Group of Chief Scientific Advisors recommending a distributed European Institute for AI in Science (EDIRAS) over a single monolithic CERN-like entity. Vote (Against 'Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN') is a reasonable mapping because Grobert explicitly advised against a monolithic CERN-style entity in favor of a distributed model, even while supporting the broader idea. Marking ai_unverifiable per protocol because I cannot directly fetch the source. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 10d ago
replying to Nicole Grobert