We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Jonas B. Sandbrink
Biosecurity researcher, University of Oxford
LLMs, such as GPT-4 and its successors, might provide dual-use information and thus remove some barriers encountered by historical biological weapons efforts. [...] BDTs may enable the creation of pandemic pathogens substantially worse than anything seen to date and could enable forms of more predictable and targeted biological weapons. In combination, the convergence of LLMs and BDTs could raise the ceiling of harm from biological agents and could make them broadly accessible. A range of interventions would help to manage risks. Independent pre-release evaluations could help understand the capabilities of models and the effectiveness of safeguards. Options for differentiated access to such tools should be carefully weighed with the benefits of openly releasing systems.Verified source (2023)
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified. The arXiv abstract for “Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design tools” lists Jonas B. Sandbrink as the author and contains the quoted sentences verbatim; the user’s [...] faithfully omits the intervening sentences between those passages. The source page is dated June 24, 2023. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13952))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 19d ago
replying to Jonas B. Sandbrink