We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
AI safety research institute
Suppose that frontier AI development is centralized to a single project under tight international controls, with all other development banned internationally. By far the likeliest outcome of this is that we all die. A centralized group of international researchers — a “CERN for AI” — can’t align superintelligence any more than decentralized organizations can. Centralization at least has the advantage that it makes it easier to shut the remaining research down; but this advantage only helps if key decision-makers actually shut down. Rather than advocating for centralization in the hope of getting an effective moratorium, it makes far more sense to just advocate for a moratorium directly.Disputed source (2025)
8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
Disputed
The supplied URL does contain the quoted passage verbatim, and the post is dated September 15, 2025. However, the page credits the piece to two individual authors, Nate Soares and Eliezer Yudkowsky, not to Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI) as a single author. Because this is a multi-author article, the stored author attribution is not canonical and this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote. ([intelligence.org](https://intelligence.org/2025/09/15/a-note-on-ai-for-medicine/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
The passage does appear verbatim on the cited MIRI page at the September 15, 2025 URL, but that page credits the piece to "Nate Soares and Eliezer Yudkowsky," not to "Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)" as the author. So the quote is real, but the attribution in the prompt is not exact. ([intelligence.org](https://intelligence.org/2025/09/15/a-note-on-ai-for-medicine/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. The quote's content aligns precisely with MIRI's documented and consistent position: (1) Belief that "default outcome is human extinction" / "we all die" from misaligned superintelligence is core to MIRI's mission, recently elaborated in their book "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" (2025); (2) Explicit advocacy for "globally coordinated and collectively enforced moratorium on the development of ASI" - MIRI's core policy stance; (3) Skepticism that any organization (centralized or not) can align superintelligence with current science. The vote "against" the statement "The CERN for AI should be completely non-profit" aligns - MIRI doesn't think the CERN for AI proposal solves the alignment problem regardless of profit structure; they advocate for direct moratorium instead. Could not fetch intelligence.org directly (blocked) but the URL pattern matches MIRI's blog format and the content is consistent with MIRI's well-documented policy positions.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)