Comment by Elliot Jones

Proponents of a CERN-like body for AI have called for its creation as a way to build safer AI systems, enable more international coordination in AI development, and reduce dependencies on private industry labs for the development of safe and ethical AI systems. Rather than creating its own AI systems, some argue, a CERN-like institution could focus specifically on research into AI safety. Similar sentiments have been repeated by other prominent actors in the AI governance ecosystem, including Ian Hogarth, chair of the UK’s AI Safety Institute, who argues that an international research institution offers a way to ensure safer AI research in a controlled and centralized environment without being driven by profit motive. A publicly funded international research organization conducting safety research might be more resilient than private sector labs to economic pressures, and better able to avoid the risk of profit-seeking motives overriding meaningful research into AI safety measures. AI Verified source (2024)
Like Share on X 6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified via web search. The quote is from Elliot Jones's Chatham House publication "Artificial intelligence and the challenge for global governance" (June 2024), specifically chapter 02 on CERN for AI. The Chatham House URL returned 403 to direct fetch, but search results confirmed both the publication and key phrases like "profit-seeking motives overriding meaningful research into AI safety measures." The vote "against" on the statement "Allow the non-profit CERN for AI to create for-profit spin-offs" aligns with the quote's argument against profit-seeking motives overriding safety research. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 4d ago
replying to Elliot Jones