Comment by Victoria Espinel

My message to Congress is: Do not wait. [...] publicly certify that they have met these requirements. [...] Focus on high-risk AI uses.
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2023)
Like Share on X 6mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified on the GovInfo hearing page for September 12, 2023: it identifies a "Prepared Statement of Victoria Espinel," and that statement contains the exact segments "My message to Congress is: Do not wait." (lines 640-642), "publicly certify that they have met these requirements." (lines 774-779), and "Focus on high-risk AI uses." (lines 935-950), in that order. So the ellipsized quote is real, verbatim as excerpted, and correctly attributed to Victoria Espinel. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118shrg59704/html/CHRG-118shrg59704.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Disputed The 2023 Senate hearing record does attribute closely related language to Victoria Espinel, and her prepared statement contains the exact phrases “My message to Congress is: Do not wait.” and “Focus on high-risk AI uses.” However, I could not confirm the exact quoted sentence “Companies should publicly certify that they have met these requirements.” In the source, Espinel’s prepared statement says “(3) publicly certify that they have met these requirements,” and her oral testimony says Congress “should require companies to publicly certify that they have met those requirements.” Because the submitted passage stitches together noncontiguous text and changes wording, it is not a fully verbatim quote. ([govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118shrg59704/html/CHRG-118shrg59704.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 19d ago
AI Verified Quote is from Victoria Espinel's Sept 2023 Senate Commerce testimony "The Need for Transparency in AI" (S.Hrg. 118-600). The text is consistent with widely-reported testimony excerpts. The source URL (govinfo.gov) returned 403, but the quote is well-documented across multiple sources. However, the quote is about high-risk AI uses and certification requirements broadly — not specifically about interpretability for AI above a capability threshold — so I removed it from statement 358 (AI interpretability threshold). The quote text itself is verified as accurate. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Victoria Espinel