Comment by Tracy Rosenberg

“We wanted those to be fairly broad and fairly standard,” she said. “Instead, it was winnowed down to only certain people that work in certain parts of an AI company — and only about certain kinds of threats that related specifically to catastrophic property damage or catastrophic property loss.” [...] “Someone has to have a crystal ball and to say, ‘I am going to whistleblow because I’m confident I can demonstrably prove that this particular safety risk that I am identifying would cause at least this much damage,’” Rosenberg said. “Because that’s what you have to do to protect yourself under this law.” [...] “If this is the only piece of AI safety that California will ever sign,” she said, “then I would say it’s nowhere near good enough.”